“We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Socialists. We are not internationalists. Our socialism is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one.”

“Socialism is an ancient Aryan, Germanic institution.”

From 1923 Interview with Adolf Hitler.

They’re just seeing that these ideas are popular and co-opt them, as usual. It’s not difficult to bastardized anything with a bit of lies and sell it to a layman.

This is really strange, the Nationalists just now launched their election campaign over here in East Europe. A random village in Ukraine is hit on July 30, where a house suffers together with a farm field. (In other words this has no military importance whatsoever)

Now they’re claiming DPRK Unit carried out this attack? I have a really hard time believing in this without further proof. I encourage others to be more skeptical. Even if this was confirmed to be 100% accurate, there’s nothing really to celebrate here, given who the alleged targets were.

I hate to live in a world where siblings have to fight between each other and hope this tragedy is brought to an end asap.

Is there any reason why you’d believe Europe would accept an end to a war or any indication they’re preparing for co-existence?

My prediction is that it will turn into a slow burn permanent war, that’s used to tackle upcoming economic crisis. Nobody could imagine people being kidnapped off of streets and look how quickly that manifested. That’s what happens when you give 19th century civilization the technology of the 21st century, historical processes will not be skipped, they simply turn more violent and brutal, as the reshaping of the social relations take place. Whether it means more or less people suffer, we’ll have to see.

There is nothing special about me, nothing unique in this prediction, if anything I am the problem,

Yeah, the picture is a bit blurry, but you can also see they’ve put engravings on it too not just the shine. I don’t know if there’s any photos avaiable that’d allow closer inspection of the craftsmanship.

Couldn’t they put at least some creativity into this? It just looks like a generic sword.

This is what I came up with in 2 minutes:

Someone should make communist sword design next.

Meanwhile in Korea:

There’s a lot of things that you don’t get shown visual evidence for because it’s difficult to share, not because it’s not out there.

I really want to see what goes on in the minds of American troops, it would be really convenient if someone leaked that chat of whatever they’re saying.

There’s an anti-fascist group I’ve been curious about, but there’s some things that I’m skeptical about and it’s causing reluctance. At the same time they’re skeptical of me, refusing to accommodate a surface level discussion… regarding any potential shared goals. And the thing is their point of view is justified in many regards I will not deny that.

It’s bene kind of depressing being usable to find more ways to contribute, but maybe I should stop being that harsh on myself and try to find a place that I can involve myself with.

I don’t think there’s any bad actors at plat here, there’s nothing that important about me, they most likely just saw someone they can’t assist and circumstances force them to prioritize other things. In this situation you just move on. I don’t think there’s a way to turn it around now that I’ve spoiled the 1st impression anyway, so I’m just moving on.

Step 1(1): Cause instability in the region and create suffering. Step 1(2): Prevent/Destroy the formation of socialist organizations.
Step 2: Bankroll the neoliberal institutions with the promise of freedom and democracy.

• If the state targets your allies - you have successfully created facts on the grounds to accuse your opponent with interference in Democracy.
• if the state doesn’t target your allies - you can eventually have them revolt and overthrow the “Regime”.

Regardless of the path you took, now that you are in charge, get the actors to privatize the property. It is very important that you do not uphold your end of the bargain and let the country plummet into despair, this maximized good citizens economic activity.

• Good citizens care about winning no matter what, they hustle for the love of winning. Naturally this is the cream of society.
• Bad citizens are infected with empathy virus and care about other human beings, sometimes at the cost of profit, can you imagine? This is why they lose, lose, lose.

By restructuring the society to benefit the good citizens you’ll make sure the most pragmatic human beings, who will do anything for the sake of, power get in power. At the same time the most compassionate people will be forced to work for you at maximum profitability rates.

P.S: You want to make sure to instill false consciousness into people through the education programs, it helps them wonder cluelessly around a maze for much longer. The more paths the better.

You can see Christian is one of the many happy participants who brought freedom to his country. After the fall of GDR Germany became free to do whatever it wants, you can tell by simply glancing over, what is going on in Germany? Nobody knows, there’s no plan. Freedom.

I think you would benefit a lot if you learned how to communicate with human beings, instead of treating them like a chatbot that needs to be prompted into action.

You already know you are interacting with reactionaries, by your own admission, so why start the discussion in a way that you know is going to irritate the very people you’re here trying to lecture?

Are you doing it because you can’t offer any appealing plan on how to use this technology, why don’t you spend your time organizing a movement for your AI revolution with easy to follow steps and then try to onboard members to your cause? It would be a lot more productive than whatever you’re attempting to do here.

You’re right and I just wanted to add on top: How can they teach about that? People might start asking questions, it’s bad enough to admit your ancestors did atrocities, but that’s not the only issue. People had homes and sometimes land also, what happened to the homes of the victims? What happened to the homes where not a single family member was left?

Part of hiding the history is shame, but it’s more sinister than that. There’s some awful stories I’ve heard since they started vandalizing memories down here in Baltics and re-opened wounds of the people. It’s really sad, because I was hoping we’d get past shit like my father’s side of the family calling us “Russian halflings” in a derogatory fashion, when I was growing up … (which progressives have always been more or less a-ok with for some reason???)

I think you might misunderstand a little, the reason why a lot of people end up condemning adventurism is because if you waste your blood on small beans, then demons breathe for longer.

When they talk about human rights… does France mean USA used to be real good at guarding slave owners, but now their greasy fingers are slipping and shit is falling apart violently.

Well the main problem is that it’s a liberal institution that is very heavy on De Jure, but very light De Facto.

Neoliberal order is all about ideas and guarding capital. It’s perfectly okay with certain types of mass murder (Like Sanctions) instead of enforcing mutual-cooperation across the board. I’m not saying it has absolutely 0 merit, but we need to get off our high horse and realize there’s no such thing as Enlightened Despots who have a moment of conscience and decided to establish some tools of justice, that’s bullshit. It was a moment of crisis and they had to budge to stabilize, a concession, which is as easily taken away as it is given.

For the world to change material relationships have to change.

I don’t know what they’re thinking about, the bourgeoisie consider me too subhuman to have a discussion with.

This “Just be normal” attitude is the same bullshit that got people like Gorbachev and his crew to assume he can just be reasonable with the Capitalists.

Yes there’s obviously benefits to being publicly likeable, approachable, accommodating, there’s benefits of learning customary norms and employing them when appropriate. At the same time this world we live in is not even close to normal, I refuse to adjust to this world. I do not want to get adjusted to this world. I don’t want to destroy this world. We can build better.