I have no idea. It was just something I noticed. If I were to guess, it’s just some odd combination of dust, resistance, and the architecture of the cores that causes a hundred little things to mesh together into a whine.
I have no idea. It was just something I noticed. If I were to guess, it’s just some odd combination of dust, resistance, and the architecture of the cores that causes a hundred little things to mesh together into a whine.
I still listen to the noises. The cpu makes a unique whine when I highlight text.
Not a clue. They got it from inside of one of the big box stores or grocery stores, so I guess from one of those little kiosks they sometimes have.
There was a service that only charged if the phone was used that day. A family member of mine would turn on their phone once a month, check messages, make a few calls, and then turn the phone off until the next month. I think they were paying about $2 a month.
Shoot, you better get a few kids (until at least one’s a girl), and ask them if they think mommy and daddy like each other.
Please stop! The flashbacks, oh god, the flashbacks!
Go watch it, and the show it spawned from. Just be prepared to feel bad because someone yanked it before it finished.
Oh, and show first, chronologically and airing date. Movie has spoilers.
I’ll do you one better on TOP of this: the lowest level offenses, like traffic tickets, don’t afford you the right to an attorney (somehow, eh? Also, catch my pun :P ). Maybe you think that’s fine, because traffic tickets are different from theft charges and assault charges, etc. etc., but the catch is the lowest level of criminal offenses bundle in with those traffic tickets. If you catch a theft charge for the lowest amount, you don’t get an attorney. If you catch a theft charge after the first, even if it’s the same dollar store candy bar amount, now you are in a higher charge, with more jail time. The pattern repeats across other crimes as well. In fact, when I was paying attention, I’d say most of the ‘crimes’ that I saw people brought in for in my city were the low level offenses, and they were always the weasel crimes of cursing, making gestures… anything that could be used to put someone in jail for the night, and they would never get representation to fight the bullshit.
Your cat isn’t name agamemnon, is it? Because good lord, that looks exactly like a cat I know, leash and all.
Same here. We’ve got some neat studies showing that serif fonts are read more quickly, which I would think is a big boon.
You must deliver some bomber flowers. Those scrubs dvds were expensive.
Pony Express
Which was a commercial failure, if anyone is curious. The whole shebang lasted less than two years. Started in 1860, bankrupt in 1861, thanks to the telegraph’s stretch across America.
I wonder if Carlson is fully aware of how deep the hole is that he is about to crawl into. He likely already is a full russian stooge, but if not, he’s about to find out just how tyrannical despots can be when you’re in their power. Imagine the open and implied threats to his life and his family as they walk him through exactly what to say. Imagine how they dissuade him when he suggests certain questions that he wants to ask. If he strays from the exact script? Somebody get a picture of him when he returns to the states, and if it’s within a week of the interview, see how many bruises, cuts, limps, or other signs of ‘treatment’ there are.
They sign up for it because the advertising is insidious. My family member signed up for it because it used the name of a well-known doctor’s group in the area. Sure, they have a deal with said doctor’s group, but it is no better than having the entire field available that medicare would have given.
The best explanation (ever) for a sovereign citizen is found in a legal opinion by a Canadian judge. He spends about 176 pages delineating their beliefs, origins, and manner of interacting with the legal system.
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abqb/doc/2012/2012abqb571/2012abqb571.html
Deever: The bifurcation of the urine stream as it exits the male urethra.
61%, according to actuaries. It’s the same reason that this law isn’t all that great in making insurance companies the new gatekeeper for ownership: permit holders are among the lowest risk for firearm incidents. People who have guns and who won’t be paying for this insurance are the real actuarial, financial risk. The suicidal and the homicidal will be nearly excluded from the policy risks because they won’t be buying the policy. The title saying “gun owners” is incorrect, because this only applies to people who “wear or carry.” Thus, the insurance cost will be low.
From driving_crooner’s link: https://www.theactuarymagazine.org/firearm-risk/
As far as I’m aware (and I’m in a super gun happy place), it’s nearly universal that the local law enforcement agency signs off on most things like this. The tax stamps for suppressors/machine guns/explosives and the carry permit all go to them. Whether your area is a ‘shall issue’ or a ‘may issue’ is where you have to dig to find out.
It will be low. Super low. $300k is pocket change when the incidence for gun carriers to use them is extremely low. It’s why we can constantly mock the tacti-cool warriors for thinking they need a gun on them at all times. Plus, the insurance company has way more flexibility in proving their client was not at fault in the incident compared to the shenanigans they have to pull now for car wrecks.
Lol, this isn’t part of my workflow! I just happened to notice it one day and was intrigued.