Despite this person in the photo saying a vote for Democrats is a vote for democracy the Democrats have zero interest in changing the current situation.
They have a good thing going for them.
When their opponent is literally fascism they don’t have to deliver anything to the people and can shame voters for being sick of it all and going third party
It is an abusive relationship
We all just say “capitalism” and end the thread right?
Most redditors will say that democrats are better than republicans, but that does not make someone a leftist. Democrats in America are center right at best and ripe with a ton of corruption of their own. Noticing that both parties are evil and we need economic reform beyond what either of them offer is the entrypoint to crossing the centerline
TFW your country has been a 1/10 for labor for decades and then a president bumps it to a 2/10 and all the neolib outlets champion him as the most pro-union president in history… 🤮
How about our current situation is an economic nightmare? But when workers attempt to use their leverage to shift it back to something actually the least bit ethical then you have a problem?
JFC neoliberals are so out of touch
Reading neoliberal apologia is vomit inducing
They’re the ones that made the call to split the bill saying it was guaranteed to pass which made no sense
We need to stop saying “if there were more democrats” and start saying “if there were more socialists”
I always tell people rcv is best when there are 3 candidates and only 2 are viable.
You can safely vote for someone who is definitely going to lose and keep the status quo
If you want a voting system that encourages the emergence of new parties then you must be able to vote for people equally and you must be able to indicate significant preference between one candidate and another
Something like ranked round robin can also cover it but I think STAR is more intuitive
We need a voting system that eliminates the spoiler effect and allows for showing intensity of preference.
RCV does neither but STAR voting does both
In the face of extreme climatic upheavals, California’s bid to unveil corporate contributions to climate change is vehemently obstructed by big industries, reflecting the stark chasm between professed “net-zero commitments” and actual corporate accountability. The insidious dance of greenwashing, underpinned by millions in lobbying, is a stark reminder that true societal transformation demands more than hollow corporate rhetoric.
The devastating fires in Maui, a tragedy long forewarned, are a stark reminder of the failure to prioritize human well-being over short-term cost considerations. My heart aches for the lives lost and the homes destroyed; this catastrophe underscores the systemic failure to heed warnings and underscores the urgent need for a compassionate, foresighted approach to our shared environment and community.
My experience has been the opposite. I’ve found that the majority of users tend to lean towards neoliberal and center-right ideologies. I guess most of them are probably American, so their warped worldview has them considering these ideologies as ‘left-wing’ instead 🙃
If I’m going to have a crook in office, I’d rather they be a crook that awakens people to the issues that matter such as medicare for all and ending the drug war. The bar is just that low
I strongly prefer STAR over ranked choice, for some significant issues that aren’t talked about enough. (slide deck).
But yes, I agree that voting reform is critical to this change, and it’s very telling that neither party are very interested in enacting it. They’ll both warn us like an abusive relationship to not vote third party “or else” but when you ask why not just support voting reform they both fall silent.
While Republicans prepare for a public debate, Democrats are coronating Biden without any democratic contestation, revealing a glaring hypocrisy. Instead of embracing an open dialogue that could invigorate the electorate, they prefer a managed image, undermining the very principles they claim to uphold. Such practices not only turn off voters but lay bare the profound contradictions within the U.S. political system.
The enthusiasm to vote against rather than for a candidate reveals the deeper crisis of a political system that effectively marginalizes meaningful alternatives.
The attempt by billionaire real estate moguls to overturn New York City’s rent stabilization law is nothing but the ruling class wielding its power to exploit the many for the benefit of the few. This isn’t just about rents in New York; it’s a manifestation of the capitalist system where the rights of property owners are sacred, but the rights of those who need shelter are negotiable. It’s a blatant class assault, a vivid example of how the rich and powerful manipulate the legal system, including the Supreme Court, to suppress the masses and perpetuate their own wealth and dominance.
The portrayal of “Bidenomics” as a success story serves as a classic illustration of how power structures manipulate economic indicators to project an image of prosperity, obscuring the underlying reality. While the figures may indicate growth and a decrease in unemployment, they are detached from the lived experiences of millions who continue to suffer from food insecurity and financial hardship. The discontinuation of essential aid programs reflects a broader systemic failure, where policies are shaped by elite interests at the expense of the vulnerable. It’s a pattern we’ve seen repeatedly in the history of state-corporate management of the economy, where the welfare of the general population is subordinated to concentrated private power.
There’s only been a limited selection up until this point
I didn’t see that in OPs comment. Would you mind explaining where you gathered that from?