“Don’t vote for that genocider: Vote for this genocider!”
“Don’t vote for that genocider: Vote for this genocider!”
So now does anyone else remember the arrow scenes from that movie Hero?
So if you really think about it, threatening them at guillotine-point into dismantling as a class is really just best for everybody.
Also, relevant Wikipedia: Puyi
Let’s steel man your argument and say you’re 100% correct. Throwing away your vote or not voting is still morally better than voting for someone who won’t commit to not enabling a genocide.
And that’s assuming your predicate is correct, which it’s not.
I think she’s going to win
Maybe, but we’ve seen this before. No one thought he’d win the first time but pollsters strongly undercounted his supporters, who didn’t respond to polls to begin with. Liberal arrogance played its role too, of course, as it usually does.
Pretty much all but the libertarian party. Turns out if enough people vote for a candidate they get elected. Weird huh?
Fun fact: The United States actually has more than 2 parties
The More You Know
A good rule of thumb is that if you’re on the same page as Hillary you’re on the wrong side of history.
Don’t they all retire after like 20 years anyway?
Excuse me, but you haven’t lived until you’ve sampled our 100% free range truck nutz 🥜
But why does he keep painting these shitty buildings? 🤔
Plus, probably less expensive than the American military
Looks at US nukes
Looks at Chinese nukes
This’ll go well, I’m sure
It’s all about breathing
Don’t threaten me with a good time
America: Planning For Failure
Mr. President, can you please define Bidenomics?
Oh boy does this feel relevant now:
https://lemmy.world/comment/12702565