Adding to that, macOS has Head Pointer built-in accessibility function since 10.15. However, she would need be able to move her head.

It allows to use different face expressions for different mouse commands, I have tried it and it’s more than enough for anything where a mouse is required.

I thought it was sufficiently slow and sluggish already, you know, C is always been faster.

You can clearly identify when that’s happening; with LLMs, it’s often uncertain unless you’re an expert in the field or at least knowledgeable.

deleted by creator

Are you AI?

Nowadays, I can’t tell apart AI memes from MS paint memes

You guys are taking my job again!

And then a new literally Fuck AI community will emerge! Or just not, hopefully.

Yeah, we get that. The thing is, there’s no rule that says how you should sit on a train, that’d be ridiculous (ofc you shouldn’t invade other seats or put your feet on them).

The article explains that an entitled white woman told a black man that she didn’t like the way he was sitting, and because the white is always right in America, that poor man got pulled out from the train and arrested: no questions asked whatsoever.

Imagine that someone tells you “I don’t like the way you word your comments” and then you get reported and banned for that without way to defend yourself; it’s the same here except that this involves racism.

deleted by creator

The future of web development is AI. Get on or get left behind.

At this point idk if I should laugh or cry

You gotta start practicing your Spanish

_/s

Can we just feed them with thispersondoesnotexist shit?

Or even better, ICE officials

Literally the same thing as the post; only the “cat” changes

UK identity verification will finally make sense

_/s

I understand how to read it

Is there a way or is just guessing? I’m out of the loop.

1. That’s a weak argument without substance. “No, you!” is not exactly a good counter.

Wdym? Can you elaborate on that? That’s literally your own argument, you just said And you’d argue wrong here, that is simply not the definition of intelligence., then you didn’t explain why nor give a definition that matches your vision of artificial intelligence, you’re just saying someone is wrong without founding your reasoning.

2. Yes, that’s exactly what I’m talking about, which refutes your argument in 1).

Again, how that refutes my own argument? Care to elaborate?

3. That’s a whole different discussion. That intelligence is required to build something has nothing to do with whether the product is intelligent.

Yes, it is, but you kept using it to “prove” your point.

The fact that you manage to mangle that up so bad is almost worrying.

Can you point out what is and why’s bad or worrying? Like I think we’re not in the same page