Formerly /u/neoKushan on reddit

  • 0 Posts
  • 163 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle









  • Please don’t tell me what I am focusing on, when I haven’t even said it

    I literally quoted you, so don’t try playing the “I never actually said that” card.

    It’s ironic that you’re now complaining about context and strawmen when you yourself started it with the whole “anyone who wants to know who you are…” argument. This mysterious “anyone” is the ultimate strawman because they’re anonymous and all encompassing. Meanwhile, you have zero idea what anyone wants from their VPN’s so you’re making the broad, sweeping statements while lacking any context yourself.


  • A dumb take is, to pay for something you might get nothing from

    And which VPN provider is it you’re getting “nothing” from? There seems to be a budding market for VPN’s out there, lots of people are paying for them and continue to do so, why do you think that is? Because the whole world is stupid and it’s a pointless waste of money? Or because they are actually in fact getting some kind of use from them?

    VPN’s have a myriad of uses, you’re focusing on some ambiguous nation-state attacker tracking you down for whatever reason. Meanwhile, quite a lot of users would just like to watch porn without having to submit ID. I’d say they’re getting plenty of use out of their VPN for that.





  • If releasing the files wasn’t likely to have an impact, they’d have been released by now.

    For even some of the most diehard MAGA folks, diddling kids is a step too far.

    Of course there’s a likelihood that the sheer number of folks involved would mean a huge amount of current and prominent politicians would have to go and that would almost certainly amount to what could best be described as a “reset” of the current political system and, well, maybe that’s the real reason they haven’t been released because neither side wants that, even though it’s painfully obvious that the system is broken and needs it.



  • Most developers are writing for developers who have approximately the same skill level and knowledge

    I think you’re correct about this, but I also think that’s part of the problem.

    On the one hand you can have technical tutorials for technical people, but to your point assuming the audience has the same skill level and knowledge is actually a mistake - no two people share the same same life, so while it’s reasonable to assume a certain level of knowledge, you still need to consider that there may be gaps - small gaps but gaps all the same and that it’s worth being explicit about things to avoid ambiguity. A common pitfall I see in a lot of tutorials or guides is not being explicit about file paths (“just add this to the config folder” - which folder? Where?), or not correctly steering the user towards the relevant documentation about configuration values while still expecting them to insert some config file specific to their system, stuff like that.

    The other end of the spectrum - the beginner, to your point might not be the target audience but a lot of people don’t realise that those folks exist. The absolute classic example I see of this is Linux for the Everyman - Lemmy is very big on promoting Linux and moving folks away from Windows/MacOS but there’s a bit of a disconnect because a lot of tutorials exist that base level of knowledge that a complete beginner doesn’t have. So they’re both not the target audience but expected to learn that stuff - and of course it doesn’t work and they stick to what they do know.

    All this is to say, writing tutorials is a skill in itself and part of that skill is knowing who your target audience really is and knowing where your knowledge is his experience from working at something for so long or a basic level of understanding you expect a user to have.


  • It used to be 26, so you could plan shows covering half a calendar year, then over the years it got cut down more and more. And it was probably not a bad thing because you typically had the same budget but meant you didn’t have to do a cheap clip show to pad out the numbers.

    That’s also why you see a lot of shows with 13 episodes, that seemingly arbitrary number is “half” a traditional season. Even Netflix, despite not traditionally caring too much about seasonal stuff or drip feeding week to week, has a lot of 13 episode seasons.

    I guess at some point people wanted even numbers (10) as 13 does feel a bit arbitrary even if there’s a reason for it.

    Personally for me I’d rather have 10 great quality episodes than 26 episodes where maybe 8 of them are great, 10 are okay and the rest are utter dogshit. The problem is that even (what I consider) great shows like Strange New Worlds, despite only having those 10 episodes per season, still has the odd naff episode.