What did you interpret the premise to be? I read the post when it was up, and it read to me like OP was saying essentially that too many toxic users and not enough admins willing to stand up to them make the overall experience not fun.
EDIT: Which is accurate in my mind at least when it comes to Lemmy
Sounds like a major perk of that instance to me.
I wanted a very 90s web-feeling GIF of a TOS science division badge
Then I’d consider this silly little guy a success.
Using a camera on public property in the EU is broadly very legal.
Using recycled parts is the best advice. As you said, it’s almost certainly overkill and the price can’t be beat.
I have to assume that’s what it was trained on…
Thanks for the explainer, that last point is really great actually and I’m surprised that Amazon/Google etc are pushing for Matter if the data isn’t sent to the internet.
I love the notion that even Twitter users had too much empathy and the platform wasn’t getting Nazified fast enough on it’s own so they had to program a robot to go around and spread propaganda.
Not sure if you are looking for blogs but I this guy is a good writer: https://rys.io/en/index.html
I am just getting started on this journey but zigbee seems great and I like that it works fine even if the wifi goes down. I’m not sure what the drawbacks are or the benefits of Matter.
Hilarious that that account’s made a single comment pushing back on classic lemmy hysteria/paranoia and then apparently left the platform.
Sure, but not by definition. Posting slop and spam is different than shitposting. This post is just slop.
“Shitposting” describes the act, not the content. Posting content “that took little to no effort” to produce is just spam. It doesn’t matter if a human made it or not.
I think quote posts are undesirable for the reasons you mentioned but I have to accept that it will be huge for adoption, and the flip side (promoting others work in a positive light) is also going to be really great.
You are the OP, you literally removed someone’s tweet from it’s original context (or reposted without fact checking) and presented it here with an entirely different, false context. The fact that it’s being misinterpreted is 100% on you for presenting it inaccurately, not the guy who’s words you misrepresented.
I actually upvoted this before deciding to fact check which took me no more than ten seconds.
This guy made a joke and a bunch of Twitter users took it seriously. Context.
Oh yeah absolutely, but I also think the goal of the AI companies is not to actually create a functioning AI that could “do a job 20% as good as a human, but 90% cheaper”, but to sell fancy software, whether it works or not, and leave the smaller companies holding the bag after they lay off their workforce.
Right? It actually makes me feel insane that the topic of “humans working less” is never in the selling points of these products.
Honestly I suspect that rather than some nefarious capitalist plot to enslave humanity, it is just more evidence that the software can’t actually do what the people selling it to big corporations claim it can do.
I’m glad we agree.