Idgi – is it saying that every game is either named “X” or “Y’s X”?
Idgi – is it saying that every game is either named “X” or “Y’s X”?
There’s the practical distinction between “everyone can do it with some dedicated intent” (so few actually bother) vs “everyone can do it on a whim”
Seems it depends on which elite/establishment, going by Wikipedia’s definition: “populism” is the political stance of “the people” against “the elite/establishment”
So by that defn, both of these examples qualify:
If it takes 1+ hours of work to remove a feature flag branch in an area of code, I wouldn’t trust the correctness of anything the AI writes and would be super skeptical about anything the humans had written.
If talking about a closed source app, their whole goal is to move off of hosting closed source systems.
Article says the decision follows a successful pilot project, so they’re willing to absorb the short term costs. Optimistically in the long run, the symbiotic benefits of having a government entity using and supporting a full FOSS system will be huge.
Oh, interesting
Hell of a frame budget to work by, but I don’t know much about game programming
You can, once you find a game that runs at 1k fps
Pretty spiteful of you
In the long run, nearly the same effect as 100% inheritance tax anyways.
The government won’t know the cash has been removed from the economy, but it’ll have been removed all the same.
But surely there’s a practical middle between “shoot first, ask later” and “sit and wait an hour”
Technically, anything can be “hacked”, but that’s the same kind of technically as “any car can be broken into”.
Just like there are ways to mitigate getting your car broken into, there are ways to mitigate getting your system compromised.
deleted by creator
But that wouldn’t satisfy their sense of self righteous vengeance. If you prevent a problem altogether, there’d be nobody to punish for it.
Unfair how? It’s paid by employers, so kinda makes sense to me, i.e. employer caused the loss of livelihood, so they pay for the benefit to the recently unemployed.
What? My intuition is there’s always gotta be some equivalent nicer refactor that could do away with such an awkward construct.
In what kind of situation would that be totally unavoidable?
That route already exists today as “the web”, where the “latest” JavaScript source is downloaded and JIT-ed by browsers. That ecosystem is also not the greatest example of stable and secure software.
Call their bluff!
If they’re SO concerned and want help signing bans for imaginary problems into law, there are plenty of real issues worth trading for in exchange.
E.g. from now on, schools nationwide are additionally funded to both prohibit litterboxes for students that identify as cats and provide free and healthy school lunches.