

Just because absurd but promising ideas were tried when they maybe shouldn’t have does not mean the government is stalkingyou.


Just because absurd but promising ideas were tried when they maybe shouldn’t have does not mean the government is stalkingyou.


Just ladybird things, I have heard.
Yes, 3 years ago.
These things are no joke. Proper labeling is no joke. They found it at some point. Just went where they had been and used a Geiger counter.


Kenya was supposed to pay for geothermal capacity and didn’t. Not suck off them corpos.
Bad publicity is bad for corpos. Cartoonishly evil is usually propaganda.


This seems like an outrage optimized article and headline. I would expect them to utilize and build power sources in this context,i.e. not compete with citizen power and potentially cheapen electricity.
Shouldn’t be allowed to exist. This removes the terror and fear of seeing an actual Co-60 rod and may kill someone.
Never abuse warning labels for comedic effect. This is deadly.


You can do legitimately useful things with computers and ai, even.
You being nasty is your own problem.


There is no simple answer to how much that amount of water actually is since different uses have different impacts. E.g. irrigation is fundamentally different from evaporative cooling. And the amount of water consumed by a household directly is miniscule compared to the goods and services that take water to provide.
If you do napkin math you will be outraged.
E.g. lawn irrigation can take up enormous amounts of water, too, with much lower benefit. Asking people to conserve water that way is probably better than shutting down data centers which do in fact render a useful service.
Keine Ahnung. Ich dachte das wäre ein altes Album oder Konzert
Rabaukenfels meint Punk Rock. Gute Nacht.


Oil is somewhat easy to transport and reroute. The producer advantage is rather small.


Yes.


our optimism may be detached from reality. A us war declaration is all but guaranteed and there are too few NATO troops to repel an invasion before the fall of tallin. The economics of war are currently unfavorable when matching Russian and NATO forces. And economic disparity is not sufficient to be able to succeed at those odds since interceptors are bloody expensive.


That is factually incorrect. Eradication of cultural identity is a war crime/genocide.
Striking the ministry of defense is not a symbolic target per SE. But decapitation of high command may not be desirable. But it may. Generally strikes against heads of state are highly frowned upon.
A symbolic target is usually not a military target. You appear to mean a high profile military target. Which is decidedly not a symbolic target.


Was killing the Ayatollah good or bad?
Decapitation creates a power vacuum and may cause inferiors to act erratically in ways that harm all participants. Such as preventive or random strikes on foreign but not hostile nations. A invasion of e.g. the Baltics may be immediate.


Destroying culturally significant buildings without military goal is both harmful to the war effort and a extremely severe war crime.
Destroying the cultural heritage such as ancient temples and churches is generally frowned upon, to put it lightly.


A table with an unopposed Nazi is a nazi table.
Same goes for stalinists.
Mk ultra sounds pretty smart. And it is. If stimulants could reduce your risk of death would you not use them?
Some medical experiments of the past don’t hold up to modern scrutiny and also were abhorrent at the time.
But the government is not stalking you personally. There is no van of cops following you at all times.