Lol hey if you come over you might find me spreading my cheeks for ya nbd jk. But actually? Hah just foolin but, well 👉👈

It’s not special rights, it’s project materials approved by leadership, and noted on a published and approved feature roadmap

Edit assuming requisitioning a scaled db replica is “special” is kinda aligned with the meme lol

Clarifying:

The government pays them a reduced salary: 70% of their wage. Tesla does not pay the other 30 during that time

Meh it’s usually for shitty companies that expect their devs to write real software, ssh into things, access databases, but put the same hurdles in front of them as joeblow from sales who can’t use an ipad to buy a sandwich without clicking a phishing link. So every new project is slowed down cause it takes weeks of emails and teams conversations to get a damn db sandbox and it’s annoying.

On the other hand IT doesn’t know you and has millions of issues to attend to

A trump win represents a faster and larger right shift, with judicial and electoral erosions, reducing the chance of future progress.

As discussion, I’m not her base. But I argue about voting strategy with a Harris conclusion.

I’m deeply unsatisfied with the democratic position on Gaza and beyond. But I’m in the anti trump base. I believe global well being, including in Gaza will be significantly worse if he gets a second term.

I will vote for any competitive, viable candidate that is left of trump, the more left the better. I will not vote for an academic choice that has no chance of winning, and is only a spoiler. Without ejection reform, and something like proportional representation, I believe one should choose based on harm reduction, even if the choice is very unsavory.

Thanks for posting why, I think it’s good to see the reason in the comments, not just the log

Obviously the biggest way to reduce impact is to not exist, and certainly not reproduce.

Mind, I’m not pointing that phrase at you, I’m speaking about any human.

Voting rights =/= dietary choices.

One thing is others imposing a lack of autonomy on others (not allowing certain people to vote)

The other thing is a personal choice that no one is stopping you from making.

It’s called the Atlantic/Pacific oceans sport

Hah it’s already sensitized https://lemm.ee/comment/15063493

The deer knows where it lives, because it knows where it livesn’t.

Sure but they can buy “art”

Eh they know they live in a very precarious perch with a population that young and disenfranchised. It’s classic authoritarian tactics to make a token nod to the masses every now and again

Yep. Who did Dasani bottle all that water for? Paying humans with mouths

What’s the plan op? Do you really think you’re gonna diversify opinion or change minds by being this combative in a thread you started, and had to have known was a spicy topic to begin with?

There are meaningful discussions to be had on the general topic but I don’t think your approach was very effective

Interview fast. Leave without notice. (Drop your equipment off of course).

The company is actively harming you. You don’t have to be nice as you get away

You really aren’t capable of actual discussion huh? Just loops and loops. You haven’t addressed the core point at all.

Edit when given the chance to discuss or clarify your position on an actual topic you just retreat to the same old lines.

Out of decorum, please note I made an edit which discuss the relationship between conservative judicial appointments and the core socialist base: the working class and the disenfranchised. I believe your comment came across while I was editing.

I’m not discussing voting strategy in this thread as you and I have discussed it before. I’m specifically discussing the content of your above comment, which you repeated, which indicates your comfortability with another trump term. I highlighted a consequence of that, which you have not addressed, and have continually tried to derail back to voting freedoms.

Edit Im not implying anything, I’m reviewing literal repeated language from you that suggests no care about at risk folks

Which means, if you’ve taken the conversation this far, that you aren’t for roe v Wade, and are pro conservative judicial activism from the bench.

Edit judicial conservatism is literally the tip of the spear of Christiofascist nationalism… One of the worst enemies of immigrants, at risk groups, and the working class in general.

Pretty incongruous with being a socialist.

I don’t know why you keep bringing up voting. I’m not discussing that