Yes
I read (sorry dont have a source) that russian fighter pilots fly commercial just to get flight hours, cause they dont get enough from the military. So uh… maybe a lot of them just didnt and maybe still dont have much experience at all. Or maybe they do now… those who still survive.
Any single plane shot down isnt small. And they allegedly shot down 4. Not just that, pilots may also be lost, which is just as if not even worse of a loss for russia.
Not in the news where I am.
Ty for answer.
Pls elaborate, this seems interesting.
Thats a neatly condenced rant, for sure.
In my defense, the internet is filled with absolute lunatics.
Gledelig jól.
\o/
You dont have to leave Israel and palestine to find more groups. Have you seen what kinds of people bibi is courting to stay in power? Ultra-orthodox far right netters who are publically asking for a cleansed ethno-state.
Does he have the grey matter faculties to do this tho?
Oi i have an idea!
He’s lying.
Dont be sorry.
Wasnt “No Child Left Behind” a Bush era policy?
Whats the source on this? If there is any
One word: projection.
You didnt criticize for shit, just a meager and baseless accusation. Bye bye.
Also, to actually jump to using a wish for someone to get shot, either as suicide or by aomeone else, well there aremt that many other eays that tops that one in showing a frankly hillarious lack of a real point or argument.
Tl;dr: you suck at presenting an actual argument. Are you a genuine child, or a poorly educated adult?
Dishonest? Nice claim, care to back it up? If you can?
The standard is simple; provide something beyond a surface level claim. Or at least make an effort to make the claim seem reasonable. In this example, the original commenter you’ve jumped to defend portrays the dems as if its all their fault… but is it? As mentioned, there is the figurative elephant (gop) in the room, and all the shit they do, but … No, the focus was on having selected biden. Not only that but also implying the blm marches were the root cause. But what about the reason for the marches? Or the actions by the elephant? Its not that the context doesnt exist just because, we all know it does. So, to then argue as if that context is gone… why should we take that as a serious and legit addition to the conversation, when its really not?
Its also amusing to see you call me/us “dishonest”, as it seems to be the exact thing you are currently doing. Theres a word for this, and it is, besides being a tried and true tactic of the elephant: projection. Accusing others of what you yourself are or have been doing yourself.
So how about it?
Did you expect the same acceptance for empty words and unfounded claims too? You dont have a base right to get a proper reply, you have to earn it by making a good point (thats worth debating) in the first place.
Here is a pointer to where you wemt wrong: painting a picture as if this is lets say the dem fault, rather than the rampaging elephant in the room, the gop. Its an old method of “arguing”, and if you want to be taken seriously, should have picked a different tactic. But you didnt so… here we are.
Didnt he basically already do that, but the trumpsterfire declined?
Never said you were, but that doesnt mean the cutoff point has to be all the way “out there” for conservative and problematic in the long run.
Besides, what do you even know about “me” given you say you used to “be like me”? You know, well perhaps not nothing but not much. And i too have met people with lots of different oppinions, yet i didnt leap towards the right, quite the opposite in fact. So… if you “used to be similar to me”, well then you’re close to falling into the deep end.
Here is some free advice: careful with what you assume you know about someone you never met before.
Not in lotr world. There its the opposite, with the male moon chasing the ‘flaming hot’ female sun across the skies.
Flaming hot is my addition but its kinda remarkably fitting : )