These are screenshots and don’t prove anything.

deleted by creator

It’s important to me that when someone makes a big claim they back it up. The challenge is that the article doesn’t say what was claimed.

I didn’t make the claim therefore nothing for me to back up.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13344953

“Too much effort to go look for it”

See how I give a source and a relevant quote?

Still being lazy I see

“I’m not lying, I’m lazy”

Dope

Why didn’t you quote the part where they are discussing restricting it?

Yes, I did read the comments.

Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.

An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.

If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.

I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.

How does it result in that?

Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.

What was breathless about the article? Seemed pretty matter of fact in its presentation.

I’m gonna hold the politicians that lied to progress their career, the pundits that argued in bad faith, the clergy that put their faith aside for their political agenda, the people that sought to hide history instead of teaching it, those that worked hard to dehumanize those they disagree with, the leaders that opted for violence as a way to garner support, and I’m sure others, as responsible also.

I’m a Mets fan.

This tension is gonna kill me! :)

Ooo, an example of the bad faith you dislike so much.

🪞

Why are there quotes around that? Is that a quote from someone?

I’m not seeing a single thing that indicates the person you’re replying to is an asshole or a dipshit.

Your comment though…

This person looked in the mirror this morning and thought to themselves “THEY are the problem!!”

Italics, bold, all caps

Hmm… are you the person in the comic? Is this new canon?

I think because this is more about exposing corruption in the DoJ than an expose about Caterpillar. Not mentioning the company in the headline can inform you that the heart of the article is the DoJ so that you’re coming into it with the right context.