That is how I always perceived it. I can’t even imagine someone saying that with a straight face as a correcting rebuke.
I apologize if you are doom reading this because I said something that came off as ignorant or offensive to you. I admit my own biases but I am honestly here to learn. I am a bit of skeptic but I am an open ear ready to be shown a better way. Let’s be friends!
That is how I always perceived it. I can’t even imagine someone saying that with a straight face as a correcting rebuke.
The UN is not useless. The whole point is to facilitate conversation between governments. They were never intended to have authoritative power.
Evil is a dumb term. The word they are looking for is “responsible”.
deleted by creator
Your reply is literally a statement with no question lol
Sorry, that was too funny not to hit on. I’m out, enjoy your day, man.
I’m done, you’re not arguing in good faith. Have a nice day, touch grass.
How am I moving goal posts? I posted info and asked a question. I’m not sure you are arguing in good faith.
So no refuting the info I posted just moving the goal posts?
The UN visited and said china’s actions were crimes against humanity but pulled back from using the word genocide out of caution. That is not the same as saying they “they don’t believe there is killing happening”.
Also the only reason China hasn’t had a deeper probe into the situation is it keeps getting downvoted at the UN Human Rights Council, guess who is voting against it? Qatar, Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan citing the risk of “alienating China”.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator