I am 100 % certain they already shape 2024.

Huh, how to add that to raw files? Interesting.

Another OP with some pixelated shait.

While a DSLR and similar devices have a dynamic range of something like 14 and more bits at ISO 100, where you lose a whole lot when compressing to 8 bits of a JPG, raws from smartphones contain next to no additional information. Actually the JPG is usually better because of how well tuned the post processing is. Giving me better control over white balance while taking the picture is the only thing that is really missing.

Talk about diving people, what a prime example. What would you say if I name fashion as one of the primary female problems? Or having good pictures on Instagram?

This is happening all over the world. The USA are just a little further ahead compared to Europe.

No worries

Sorry is the absolute number is slightly off. I thought the round number made it clear that it was not supposed to be a precise estimate but a general “this is how irrelevant they are compared to normal loses”.

That’s on the level of “everything could be made up to fool me” or matrix kind of stuff. You can simply be a poll worker yourself.

Today 8000 Tomorrow 7000 …6000 … etc.

Interesting. Thank you. How do you ID?

How is trust involved in that process?

… Why is it blurred if she is wearing a bra…?

Interesting, given the stories of people voting several times by just going to different places.

How do they move from wherever they die to the general poop area?

You know how people outside the USA vote? They go there, show their ID, get a tick on the list of voters, and do the voting.

Happened before in general? Or specially to me? Everything as is exactly everything or just general things (getting up, working, …)?

So many options that mean entirely different things.

You meant to say those who voted for him, right? What are obviously not just white men.

What does osmosis have to do with anything?

Climate change if a defining issue in this election? What? Since when?