Deebster

I used to run a plugin on my Kodi that would make TV-style channels based on the original airing channel, complete with EPG and everything.

However, it wouldn’t let you add lists of shows and create channels that way. I never got around to making my version, but perhaps someone else has done the work since then.

It’s so rare that we get a new video, but it’s always a special day when it happens.

Parth Ferengi’s Heart Place

It’s can’t be anything else, surely! I kinda want that ep to have a character that can’t act.

I’d add that Picard now also has spoilers for DS9.

You mean community, btw (sh.itjust.works is the instance).

FYI, the www-less version doesn’t work for me, try https://www.sci-hub.st/

(Somehow I ended up on an old version before reporting this here)

FYI, the www-less version doesn’t work for me, try https://www.sci-hub.st/

@remindme@mstdn.social 4 weeks

I’m not sure where your skillets and specializations lie

I love that autocorrect (I asssume) typo.

Alan Schaaf created Imgur while he was at uni and he never worked for Reddit, but I believe it was made for Reddit primarily (Reddit didn’t support uploading images until 2016).

Reddit hardly came up with that thermometer-style fundraising display; it’s older then the internet.

Yeah, I wasn’t arguing, just thinking out loud too. I think the whole decentralised aspect of the fediverse means that ownership has to have a cryptographic answer because there’s no central source of truth that everyone can agree on.

I think moving accounts is a little easier than you think, apart from who gets to say that something should move. It’d be better to have a “pull” than something like the “push” solution that currently exists on Mastodon - there you can forward an account to a new place, as long as the old instance exists and cooperates (big ifs).

I’m mostly thinking about moving accounts (+ communities) in the case of when an instance suddenly vanishes.

Posts and comments have a canonical URL (i.e. the original submission’s URL that’s linked to via the Fediverse pentagram), so that can be used as a foreign key when comparing.

I think identify claiming would need to have been designed into the original spec with something like a public/private key for account ownership to allow moving of related data in a safe way, or e.g. editing a post from a different instance than originally posted it.

I’m really glad they don’t! There’s so many ways to ask for a link to open in a new tab, but it’s much harder to make links open in the same tab once target=_blank is set.

The line breaks haven’t worked, here’s it formatted correctly:

Explanation: it’s mostly due to how js does type conversion.

For the Ls, it’s:

• [] is an empty array
• ![] is treated as false
• combining a boolean with the empty array returns “false” as a string (so true + [] = “true”, false + [] = “false”)
• ! + [] is treated as true
• ! + [] + ! + [] is treated as 2 since true + true = 1 + 1 = 2
• so you have “false”[2], which is l

for the o it’s:

• [] is an empty array
• [] + {} returns “[object Object]” as a string ({} + [] returns 0)
• ![] is false
• !![] is true
• +!![] casts it to an integer
• so that part is “[object Object]”[1], which returns “o”-

And no upvotes, because it’s obviously a stupid, unworkable idea.

What are your new predictions, oh time wizard?

I always think this joke is more of a linguistics/grammar joke than programming. The kid resolves the ambiguity in the ellipsis incorrectly, but why is this a programmer joke?