Thanks for reading! The original theme maker basically mastered the header, as they should since they made the theme. For example, you could always press the / key to bring up the search menu on any page with this theme, it’s just that it wasn’t advertised. Hence, like them, we put the shortcut in the new search bar.

I’m not 100% sold on the pillbox and I’m looking at ways to think of it differently; it works well on their wiki for various reasons, but I feel it’s a bit out of place on our wiki and there’s an information overload. Still, it allows us to compactly (as you pointed out) direct visitors to areas that we want them to look at, like our marxism portal, or areas of the website that we know they are often looking for. I notice now I didn’t really talk about the pillbox in the article, I might go back in and edit that.

Hahaha the game is a scam but the wiki is a work of art, though I find them to be better on visuals than coding, there’s very little documentation for the theme and they rely heavily on css variables in a way that makes them very difficult to understand and modify.

Because neutron bombs have never been tested on actual people, we can only speculate what damage they cause. Further in the article for example I posted an article (that someone found for me a posteriori) of eyewitness accounts in Gaza saying victims of bombs were just turned to ash on the spot.

Someone else here however postulated there should be other sources experts can look at to take samples and test them.

But the ballast is made from Depleted Uranium, whereas the concentration that was found is higher Enriched Uranium. Logically there should be less EU than naturally occurs in uranium if the concentration of DU was brought up.

detect atmospheric use of even very low yield nuclear weapons

I think this should be the next step, yeah. Very likely it can be detected.

It’s possible they’re EU bullets, but I also don’t think that would make sense because EU is much more difficult to find (and thus expensive) than DU. I also can’t find their existing from looking it up online but we all know how terrible search engines are now.

I sent the links to the editorship for review

They claim

I hope Russia invades your house. Not your country or neighbourhood, but just your house specifically.

You have no idea how to balance a budget.

“Hmm, candles cost me 1500$ a month. But on the other hand, I could save 200$ a month if I reduced my groceries. I need to save 1000$, clearly I’ll just stop buying groceries” that’s your solution lol

Genocide of native Americans is solved because they get to build casinos lmao I hope you lose all your money there and go bankrupt, gtfo

Ethnic minorities in Indonesia with US guidance 🙃 Koreans 🙃 Vietnam 🙃

Bro really thought no genocides happened in the 50s huh

All human creative output is biased, ProleWiki just doesn’t pretend it’s not biased by hiding behind scholars and quotes that agree with the editor.

It does give a definition: that there is none (lack of a definition is a definition). This is pretty clear if you read the whole page. Authoritarianism is just trying to distance itself from authority because all states wield authority in various ways, and so a word was created to separate the two and criticize the socialist bloc that also wielded authority, like the west did, but their authority was bad you see, not like ours which is good.

But why am I saying this; you didn’t read the page, you’re not gonna read this either.

In fact nobody has ever really been able to articulate to me why authoritarianism is bad beyond “I want my freedom”. It just inherently is undesirable, don’t ask too many questions, just accept it.

More than 1/6th of the world still is, and it’s working spectacularly for them

Communism is indissociable from its three components, which includes a political system: dialectical materialism (the philosophical part), the labour theory of value (the economic part), and the class struggle (the social thus political part).

Anything other than Marxism is ineffectual in the real world and leads to nothing as exemplified by 200 years of history. “Tankies” don’t “happen” to have an economic theory, it’s an integral part to the whole of Marxism and Marxism could not exist without the economic basis for it. Why do we dislike capitalism? Because through math we can prove it is rife with contradictions and invariably leads to imperialism. Otherwise why would we want communism? Just because it’s cool to be a communist? Just because it’s a hobby? There has to be an actual justification for what we want.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

The best part of comments like yours is trying to figure out your ideology. Could be anything, really.

You’re deflecting. The Soviets were not fascists and you know this.