Comrade_Bones [he/him]

I mean, yeah, piracy is stealing. I thought most people were okay with it because it’s mostly done with games and movies made by huge corporations who’ve already paid their developers and actors, and thus you’re not actually stealing from artists. I’ve personally never understood the “I never would have bought and watched/played this anyway” argument, because here you are, watching/playing it. But also, I really don’t care if other people pirate stuff, people must have their reasons.

Maybe I’m just going hard on the whole anti generative AI thing because of my personal connection to and harm I see it causing to people I know. But on the whole, considering the environmental impact, the corporatization of the technology, the exploitation of artists, the killing of creativity/critical thought, and the absolutely gross techbro culture that’s spwaned out of it, I just thought more people on this site would be against generative AI in general.

All of the art that was used to train generative AI was used without its creator’s permission, meaning they weren’t compensated for all of the years of work and study that went into creating it. Then all of that labour was repackaged into a product that corporations are selling at a premium, with none of the money going back to the people who made the creation of it possible. These companies have well admitted that they wouldn’t be able to make a profit if they had to actually pay all these artists for their work. Now obviously, that isn’t technically stealing, but neither is it harmless. I personally know several artists who’ve told me that work has dried up in the years since generative AI became popular, and who are upset that their own work was used to train the machines that are replacing them.

As someone who also has aphantasia, but still likes to draw sometimes, this feels so strange for me to read.

I would never pay an artist for a dnd character portrait - it is too expensive for me and while I like having a nice character portrait and it helps me have a better conceptualization of my character, it is not worth the time or money to get a real artist to make one. If not for genai, I’d just go on deviantart and use one somebody already made or like draw a really shitty one.

If you don’t consider a drawing of your character to be worth any amount of money that you’d be willing to pay an artist, why do you feel the need to have one at all? And to say you’d go to an artist’s page and use one of their character drawings as your own, something that artists famously hate, means that you don’t even want to have a better conceptualization of your character since the drawing would just be of someone else’s character. Also, I do think that any drawing you make on your own would be infinitely more charming than any generic overly polished piece of art generative AI could spit out.

I mean, to be fair, the tariffs were done by executive order so the whole trade agreement is sort of hinged on him. It makes sense that China would send Xi to talk him down rather than just direct him to the ministry of finance or something.

Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s just been assimilating all the posts accusing Elon of tampering with it into its own data set, and spitting it back out as the truth.

Like, obviously they tweaked its code to talk about white genocide a couple of days ago, but there’s no way the AI itself would know this or talk about it like so.

Absolutely hilarious to me that Kamala’s two most famous quotes, “You think you just fell out of a coconut tree? You exist in the context of all in which you live and what came before you,” and “What can be, unburdened by what has been.” Are just two completely mutually exclusive statements.

Just hearing the phrase ‘officer involved shooting’ makes me want to involve myself in an officer involved shooting.