Imagine a President Vance. Compare to a President Waltz. Either would be possible.
Imagine a President Vance. Compare to a President Waltz. Either would be possible.
But she did – fracking??
It’s depressing that you have to even say that it’s untrue.
But Kamala Harris should have poited that out and reminded everyone that Trump wouldn’t answer. Then it would be her jabbing him instead of some talking head no one knows letting it pass. Missed opportunity.
Problem is that “Majority” isn’t gonna get rid of the Electoral College. Because Electoral College. Unpopulated states still have excess control.
Facist. Because a jury of 12 voted unanimously to convict him, on every single charge. Quite a conspiracy the Biden admin engineered there. /s
You getting that sweet attention you so obviouly crave yet?
Hard to square presidential immunity with the concept of Originalism in law. Surely, if the President being immune to prosecution were intended to be a thing, wouldn’t the framers have specifically stated that in the Constitution? I mean, come on!
Israel uses a significant amount of the $$ the US gives them to lobby (IOW, bribe) members of the US political parties to support them. Including giving them more $$, in a positive feedback loop. The lobbied polits in effect give themselves money along with what Israel keeps.
Took me about half hour to get logged back on!! The damn Android system blocked the button I needed to paste the absurdly complex password onto the form. Wish you coild do changes without making people log back on!
Or if most of the population just decides to ignore the constitution. But how likely is that?
Well, guess what’s gonna happen then. If you are in danger of starving, do you refuse a bruised apple or wait for pizza?
Wonder if Putin will sen Mike Johnson a well-deserved thank you card. ❤️
Would they be that rigid if they didn’t have a huge country basically and unconditionally bankrolling to them?
Truly: how are such judgements supposed to be enforced?? Dock his pay?
Gift certificate. That’s something that can NEVER be mistaken for romance.
How about “only chance”?
And it’s ok for something claiming to be a “news source” to be political?
Am I the only person who noticed that JD didn’t have overdone eyeliner during last night’s debate? Like the campaign maybe sprung for a competent makeup artist this time?