Tried that. Now numbness is interspersed with extreme recklessness
Tried that. Now numbness is interspersed with extreme recklessness
Putting international pressure on Taiwan to declare independence is not openly supporting them.
The math would mean they have labeled every post-pubescent boy as Hamas.
I would think combative is closer to your connotation and adversarial is judgement neutral.
Rios, sitting in the backseat of the police cruiser, turned his tirade against Officer Alexander Welch, an English-born American citizen, as the lawmaker pointed out the officer’s accent and bizarrely claimed that he doesn’t think “people from England should be arresting Americans.”
“Your country is being overtaken by f–king migrants and refugees, right?” Rios asked, citing the refugee crisis in England.
“You’re arresting me for driving home. But people come into your country and rape your women. And I’m the f–king bad guy? I’m going to fight for the people of England more than you ever would, you little bitch.”
Not in US though
I’m not doubting you, but do you have any sources? I’d like to read more.
Most forget to put both New and Old Hampshire
Anger is clearly not an emotion /s
Hi, that’s me. I can handle endless heat, but fuck temps under 60.
I’ve been registered to vote in blue and red states and the barriers to vote in red states are so much higher. Lines are longer, in less convenient locations, registration has to be done earlier, and sometime they might not count your vote or purge a voter directory and you have to check yourself to see if that the case so you can correct it. It’s more than people can’t be arsed to vote; it is intentionally made as inconvenient as possible.
I think that’s how you get skinned by the devil
I’m just a simple statistican, but I would be more worried about sun exposure, tap water quality, air quality, processed foods and occupational hazards (depending on job) over 3-4 drinks per year.
The better conclusion is “people who drink in moderation have a decreased risk of cancer”, which is different. Causation is hard to prove, especially when we can only ethically do observational studies. It’s just as likely that people who drink in moderation are more likely to make healthy choices in other areas of their life or have other factors that reduce risk.
I understand your conclusion, but in my experience not many people are advocating for reducing their 1st amendment rights. The majority of my experience with people claiming free speech is when it doesn’t apply. Like it does not protect anyone from being laughed at, ostracized, does not force people to buy goods or services from someone who says wild shit, and no one is required to give them a platform.
People only invoke the feelings of the founders when they either don’t have a stronger argument or are trying to appeal to conservatives. It’s basically religious interpretation at this point - mostly used to manipulate people who don’t know better.
It’s also a live telephone poll. This type of pole has a lot of trouble getting a representative sample of people under the age of 40.