I appreciate this, I really do, but you do have to be careful not to end up like certain leftist Reddit subs where I got banned for the heinous crime of suggesting that voting for Harris might produce better outcomes than voting for Trump. Some level of discussion that goes beyond what the majority (or, lbr, the mods) think has to be allowed or you just have an echo chamber.

Granted, that isn’t what is happening in the comic. The apologist here is genuinely advocating tolerance of Nazis. This situation is appropriate.

Fill my holy churn with honey cheese

I’m sorry what the fuck

Ah but don’t forget, we in the UK left the EU. Bo Jo already considered invading the Netherlands once.

Ben Shapiro “sell your collapsing coastal house” energy.

Womens clothes so often suck in terms of quality compared to men’s. My partner is nb, but fits women’s clothes best… They can’t find suits of anything like the kind of quality you can for men’s. Certainly not in more than a couple of styles.

Depending on where you live you can just go pick them from the ground. Obviously take care and make sure you can ID correctly… But it costs only time.

I would honestly say avoid looking in the mirror when you’re having a GOOD trip. You’ll be trapped! Trapped I say!

Here you go

Great! Please, take them all.

Do people hoard food? I suppose preppers, but they aren’t likely to want any kind of method to decide what to get rid of. Plus, if you do decide to you can just stop buying food and eat your hoard.

Your model is lacking in one area - poopy() has an inverse poopwash() where for some set of poopy objects Y, poopwash maps Y to a subset of the set of real world objects, but there exists a set of poopy objects Z for which poopwash maps Z to a subset of poopy objects.

My initial instinct was to suggest that for all z in Z, keep(z) = false, however I believe your million dollar example runs counter to this. Nonetheless, I suspect there is a useful subset of Z, let’s say S, for which we can say, for all s in S, keep(s) = false.

A fair point - here’s a generalisation. W denotes windows, M the ability to move, a and b are two objects for which their possession of windows and ability to move (or otherwise) is known, and x is some other object.

(W(a) ^ W(b)) ^ (M(a) ^ ¬M(b)) -> ¬(W(x) -> M(x))

An appropriate deduction might be “Cars have windows and can move, houses have windows and cannot move. The presence of windows alone is not what allows the car to move.”

That’s a pretty extreme reaction, it’s just a shop.

Name one unattractive dancer. I guarantee no one can do this. They’re all hot. All of them.

Ebeneezer Goode looks great post transition

I would advise not doing that in Ireland. Anyway, yes, p*** has a comparable if not so extreme or long history as the n-word in the UK.

Just f as in fan then roll the r. Frrrrrrrrrrr. Fr fr sounds like two short bursts of submachine gun fire.

What’s heavier, 40kg of feathers or 40kg of steel?

She’s an olympic gymnast I think she can probably hold 40kg…