• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, which is why I phrased my statement as “Well, … could…” to indicate an alternative perspective. This was to illustrate that sometimes pithy reductive quips can be based on overly reductive assumptions. Maybe it is the case that a single baby is all that’s required, but maybe the author misunderstood the goal.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In this fictional scenario of the author’s creation? That just demonstrates the converse - that sometimes simple ideas will be deliberately misinterpreted in a convoluted way, to prove someone else’s point.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          In this fictional scenario of the author’s creation?

          So a straw man? Or are we supposed to infer that this is an illustrative example of actual behavior?