• cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Save the children is basically a generic statement obviously,” lead convoy organizer Gordon Berry told PressProgress. “There’s a multitude of things you could be saving them from.”

    Berry says the convoy wants to save children from the “human trafficking industry,” but also from “mandating the shots to kids and kids getting sick and frigging education and all the stuff they’re teaching them in schools and the trans agenda and the math agenda, gender dysphoria – all of these things.”

    Oh, so it’s mostly about being an anti-LGTBQ and education hate parade, with some flat earth and anti vax thrown in.

    “Trudeau’s paying LGBTQ a million dollars”

    Does he think LGTBQ is like a company or secret society or something?!

    “You got to save them from the whole system.”

    I can understand where he’s coming from here, the system clearly failed him.

    • Dearche@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I understand that the system failed him, or at least failed someone close to him. But what he’s doing is just generally raging against the leaders and using random excuses to justify causing chaos.

      There’s no focus, no message. No way for anybody to respond in any way other than flat out rejection. How can you respond to something like this if when you try, it’s like “okay, I understand this this this, and this. But this one and these three others are unacceptable to us. But then there’s another sixteen that we can talk about. Please give us your side of the story and we can continue from there.” How do you form a conversation with that?

      Not to mention that he’s trying to gather people from the widest spectrum he can, each with a different grievance. How do you talk when you have a dozen “I won’t budge on this one thing” when each one thing is something different? Just like the previous convoy, it’s just plain civil disobedience for the sake of letting out steam, no actual attempt at making change.

      • cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I agree with you.

        There’s no actual real concern, it’s just a bunch of glued together conspiracies and dog whistles.

        The whole thing is gross.

      • jadero@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had a very strange conversation a couple of years ago. It seems that some people think that math is used only as a tool to control the population or something.

        We were talking about something that most people would consider pretty innocuous, catch and release fishing. I mentioned that I had recently read an article that claimed that mortality among released fish was still high enough that approximately every second released fish should be counted against your limit because of the percentage of released fish that die of catch-related causes.

        That lit the other guy’s hair on fire. “That’s math! You can’t seriously think that math is real? It’s all made up!” (Or words to that effect. Mouth frothing removed to protect the innocent.)

        Over the course of the rest of the conversation, I “learned” that math was invented as a tool of oppression. Science uses math to create fake knowledge. Our senses are the only true sources of knowledge.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are anti-everything they don’t understand. Unfortunately that’s most things.

        • snoons@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          How to control a population 101:

          Make them only trust their emotions.

        • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they actually followed through with that you’d kind of have to admire it. What else would they have to do away with? All abstract concepts obviously, along with everything they’d been told, read, or imagined. How about theory of mind? Object permanence? Would they be newly surprised by the sunrise every day?

          • jadero@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It devolves pretty quickly into an infantile solipsism. The world exists only for me, and only when I’m looking.

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        These are people that literally never grew up.

        It’s the 8 year old mentality of ‘math is hard and confusing, I would rather spend the day living in my imaginary world’

        What we are seeing now is the temper tantrum that happens when someone challenges them to leave their comfort zone.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A temper tantrum that goes on for years. At least with children it’s usually over in minutes.

      • sndmn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Math has a known liberal bias.

        I expect they’d be upset about arabic numerals if they knew that’s what they’re called.

      • Smatt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that stood out to me too, I’ve heard of these other dumb things.