• Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So you didn’t read, nor understand. Which shouldn’t be surprising given that having basic understanding of simple math can only mean copying from an LLM to you. You too can learn what the scary triangles mean, it’s not that difficult.

      Why did the $300 billion from the NWF plus whatever hundreds of billions of QE drain out of the economy?

      You keep ignoring that part for some odd reason.

        • Vergissmeinnicht@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          War is expensive. Who would have thought? Does that prove anything about sanctions?

          Yes, because war spending is still spending, and acts as a stimulus, increasing GDP. The amount of increased spending accounts for a bigger share of GDP than their GDP growth figures account for, so without this extra spending their GDP growth would be negative, due to sanctions.

          And a 300B+ (rubles not USD)

          You’re right, I had my numbers mixed up. The NWF spending accounted only for $70B (5.3T Rubles)

          It’s the gutting of the liquidity of Russia’s banks that accounted for the majority of the stimulus and was even higher than the $300B that I remembered, at $446B (36.6T Rubles) by early 2025 https://navigatingrussia.substack.com/p/russias-hidden-war-debt-full-report

          This plus the NWF spending accounts for 20% of GDP, or roughly 5% per year over 4 years. Russia’s growth numbers were significantly lower than that at between -2.1% and + 4.3%. So on average, without the stimulus spending not a single year since the beginning of the war would have been positive economic growth.

          A human commenting online would just spell out delta.

          Admit you don’t know calculus without telling me you don’t know calculus. You write the letter, you don’t spell it out.

          And the non-monetary consequences of sanctions, that you also keep ignoring. From your own source:

          Russia’s military has difficulty procuring key components

          Which is why the Iskander production figures are fluctuating for example, and are much lower than they would be without sanctions. To come back to your favourite weapon, the ballistic missile.