Let me preface by saying, I would love to hear counter points and am fully open to the fact that I could be wrong and totally out of touch. I just want to have some dialogue around something that’s been bothering me in the fediverse.

More and more often I keep hearing people refer to “normies”. I think by referring to other people as “normies”, whether you intend to or not, you inadvertently gatekeep and create an exclusive environment rather than an inclusive one in the fediverse.

If I was not that familiar with the fediverse and decided to check it out and the first thing I read was a comment about “normies”, I would quite honestly be very put off. It totally has a negative connotation and doesn’t even encapsulate any one group. I just read a comment about someone grouping a racist uncle and funny friend into the same category of normie because they aren’t up to date on the fediverse or super tech savvy or whatever.

I don’t want to see any Meta bs in the fediverse. I barely want to see half of the stuff from Reddit in the fediverse. I don’t want to see the same echo chamber I do everywhere else.

I do want to see more users and more perspectives and a larger user base though. I want to see kindness and compassion. I want to talk to people about topics they are interested in. I want to have relevant discussions without it dissolving into some commentary on some unrelated hot topic thing.

I think calling people normies creates a more toxic, exclusive place which I personally came here to avoid.

Just my two cents! I know for most people using the term it isn’t meant to be malicious, but I think it comes off that way.

Love to hear all of your thoughts.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But that’s pretty much what a group of people is? The people who are inside the group and those that are outside. What is the problem with this?

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You missed to very key letters here. Here’s the original statement with the two key letters highlighted:

      […]creating an us →vs← them mentality though…

      Nobody that I’ve seen here has said that there is no “in” or “out” vis a vis the group. The objection is over those two key letters.

    • grady77@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean not get too far down that rabbit hole, but I would argue that we are all human beings first and we all belong to many different groups, not just one.

      And I think you’re missing my point.

      • macniel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        of course can groups overlap, and we are all humans but that doesn’t mean that group dynamics are a bad thing?

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          These aren’t actual group dynamics. In any way. Exclusion and “us vs them” is not a positive group dynamic. Do not promote it.

          • DrNeurohax@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you’re saying there are people who DO use “normies” and people that DON’T use “normies”. These are not two groups of people. Shit, I just joined this thread, so that makes ME one of YOU, and there’s OTHERS that aren’t here. Are WE the elitists? Or are THEY the “normies”? YOU said there’s no there’s no US or THEM, so EVERYONE is talking in this thread. ANYONE not in this thread must not exist because I know I exist, so YOU thread posters must exist, but wait, that makes ME an US and YOU a THEM.

            (I’m not trying to be snarky, but this argument is exactly as nonsensical.)