sunnie@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前linux rulesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up11.1Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imagelinux rulesopuli.xyzsunnie@sopuli.xyz to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 年前message-square80fedilink
minus-squaremax@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 年前Parts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前i’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前 And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.
Parts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
i’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. Of which there is quite a lot. Hell, even pets that aren’t considered live-stock outright, like Horses, consume tremendous amounts of feed that isn’t just by-products.
what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.