Toes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agoGlitch in the matrixani.socialimagemessage-square571fedilinkarrow-up1422arrow-down10
arrow-up1422arrow-down1imageGlitch in the matrixani.socialToes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 years agomessage-square571fedilink
minus-squarederphurr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 years agoNo there is no clear right answer because it is ambiguous. You would never seen it written that way. Does it mean A÷[(B)©] or A÷B*C
minus-squarederphurr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoNo. It’s ambiguous. In a math book or written by anyone that actually uses math, you don’t have a “%” You group stuff below the line, and you use parens and brackets to group things like (a + b) and (x)(y) so that it is not ambiguous. 2/xy would be almost always interpreted differently than 2/x(x+y) which is ambiguous and could mean (2/x)(x+y) or 2/[(x)(x+y)]
minus-squareAnd009@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoIt’s 16, addition in bracket comes first
deleted by creator
No there is no clear right answer because it is ambiguous. You would never seen it written that way.
Does it mean A÷[(B)©] or A÷B*C
deleted by creator
No. It’s ambiguous. In a math book or written by anyone that actually uses math, you don’t have a “%”
You group stuff below the line, and you use parens and brackets to group things like (a + b) and (x)(y) so that it is not ambiguous.
2/xy would be almost always interpreted differently than 2/x(x+y) which is ambiguous and could mean (2/x)(x+y) or 2/[(x)(x+y)]
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s 16, addition in bracket comes first