• macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    100M users in a week by turning every instagram account into a threads account; until its activated it remains a shadow account but still counts in their book.

    And it would only be a protocol extension when it would be returned upstream, which I highly doubt that Facebook’s parent company Meta would do that.

    • nave@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all instagram users counted they would have 2 billion users. I dislike Meta as much as the next guy but let’s not pretend threads isn’t ridiculously popular.

    • vaguerant@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are literally, not exaggerating, over one billion Instagram accounts in existence. It’s self-evidently not the case that they have just silently registered everybody a Threads account and are counting those numbers.

      • macniel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know whats the big issue here is? That those who were nagged into trying Threads, can’t back out as it would kill their Instagram accounts as well. So all those conflated numbers will be dead in the water.

        • masterspace@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know what’s irrelevant to the current conversation about how they have so many users they don’t need us?

          How many fediverse accounts are there total? A couple hundred thousand? And how many of those are duplicates across instances?

          Whether or not all those users stick is irrelevant, the user counts for lemmy / kbin also won’t have all of them stick. The point is that they do not need us or our content. They can hit a bill without even supporting activitypub.