“Twitter owner calls Facebook founder a ‘cuck’ as rancour grows over launch of Threads, a competitor to Musk’s network”

Man I thought this was The Onion at first

    • fuser@quex.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      it’s not an assumption at this point. They are just a pair of losers who got lucky. They are the best argument imaginable for restoration of a 90% tax rate and inheritance taxes.

        • middlemuddle@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, because the US immediately post-WW2 was an incredibly stagnant society with no visible benefits to the middle class.

            • NotSteve_@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              35
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not American but the US had an extremely high tax rate on the rich for most of its prosperous years. It was only recent removed and you now have massive wealth inequality

              • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                23
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not to mention fantastic spending on college/university (GI Bill) to both slow the impact of returning military on the job market and to create a highly educated work force. Also, incredible help for people to become homeowners, creating generational wealth (GI Bill again), unless you were black.

                People act like high taxes on the wealthy would be a problem, when in reality what happened is the wealthy poured more of the excess wealth into their businesses, which benefitted everyone. It’s so annoying that we freaking know what works and what doesn’t (trickle-down), yet still argue about their efficacy.

                • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I love how the “conservative” idea is to return to 1950s socially, but sure not economically! It’s also pretty clear that this idea that somehow having a 1% is driving the nation. Case in point this spat! Does Musk and Zuck fighting or competing in social media do much of anything for the country as a whole? At most, it’s similar to what DC and Marvel competing in entertainment IMHO. I guess Twitter vs Facebook does something regarding society, but making it non-stagnant? I guess a lot of people were introduced to the term ‘cuck’.

              • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                We also had a far less globalised market at the time where it wasn’t as easy to move your money or citizenship to a country with friendler taxes.

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              1 year ago

              Maybe do some reading on the history of taxation in the US. I’m surprised you’re unfamiliar with what they’re referring to when you hold such strong opinions on the matter.

            • vern1@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not OP, but we actually had a tax rate that high back then, and the US experienced unprecedented economic growth and technological innovation, along with an insanely strong middle class.

        • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I don’t, so I strongly support anti-trust legislation and much higher taxes on the wealthy, on wealth, to prevent stagnation.