People are losing trust in mainstream media because of perceived biased coverage of the Gaza genocide. If that erosion of trust is real, why isn’t it prompting wider public re-examination of historical cover-ups and contested narratives — Watergate, Iran–Contra, Iraq, even shifting beliefs about who “beat” the Nazis? If we don’t question how past information was shaped, what’s the point of preserving evidence (e.g., Gaza genocide evidence recently removed from YouTube by Google)? Won’t this all be forgotten in a few years, the same way all those previous events are no longer discussed?
What’s stopping a sustained, constructive public inquiry into these parallels between past cover-ups and current information control? Where are good, constructive places to discuss these issues without falling into unproductive conspiracy spirals?
You know that Watergate, Iran-Contra, and Iraq are settled history at this point, right? They are no longer contested by serious people. A better example might be the JFK assassination & cover-up, or better yet, ongoing events like the astroturfed Mexican “gen-z revolution” or the fake Venezuelan “narco-terrorism” the US made up in an attempt to overthrow president Maduro.
The fediverse, which for the most part currently isn’t run by corporations or by NGOs funded by governments or corporations. There are also a few independent, non-corporate, non-NGO investigative reporting sources. I can name a few good ones if you like. People on lemmy.ml often post articles from them.