Yeah, I don’t get the point of including a protocol together with 3 big corpos. Use a recursive resolver (with caching) instead of a forwarding one, and it’s fully decentralised at the TLD level. If the root nameservers or .com’s stop responding, either your uplink is down or the internet as we know it has ended
You mean things tend to fail at the highly redundant eventually consistent format-agnostic global distributed database and not on the stateless data transformers?
Luckily DNS is somewhat decentralized.
Yeah, I don’t get the point of including a protocol together with 3 big corpos. Use a recursive resolver (with caching) instead of a forwarding one, and it’s fully decentralised at the TLD level. If the root nameservers or .com’s stop responding, either your uplink is down or the internet as we know it has ended
It’s still always DNS for some reason
You mean things tend to fail at the highly redundant eventually consistent format-agnostic global distributed database and not on the stateless data transformers?
Who could have guessed?
“It can’t be DNS!”
“… It was DNS.”
It’s a haiku:
It’s not DNS
There’s no WAY it’s DNS
…it was DNS.
isitdns.com
Maybe it’s Maybelline.