• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 小时前

    Massive property tax increase. Owner-occupants are exempted from that tax.

    As soon as a bank initiates foreclosure proceedings, they owe the full, non-exempt tax rate. That stick gives them a strong incentive to work with their borrower.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 小时前

      That article also talks about a lot of the properties being tear downs. It’s easy to say that a homeless person would find just about anything a step up, but realistically it has to be habitable, salable, maintainable. No one would want the liability of a below standard house, nor the PR hit of giving a junk house

      • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 小时前

        That’s what I was thinking, too. The article says 116 houses per homeless person in Detroit. Has this person ever been to Detroit? Vacant houses there aren’t even safe to look at.

      • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 小时前

        I’ve been homeless. Give me a shit house I can call mine and let me work to improve it. Let me put money into replacing the pipes and removing the mold instead of into rent. With the prices landlords are charging these days, it would be easy.