I don’t think that is that enourmous. It’s more splitting hairs. For example, we can ballpark keeping a home 1°C warmer or cooler year round to be about 500kWh per year, conservatively. That is 5x as much carbon saved at the cost of a difference in comfort that most people wouldn’t notice at all.
Should people care about these savings versus the convenience of freezer position? Sure. But we can’t count on individuals to really consistently give any shits about the climate. And banning freezer-on-the-bottom fridges would be… a touch politically unpopular.
A far better solution than criticizing people’s fridge layout choices is just levying a carbon tax, since then any given person can decide if they want their carbon budget to go towards fridge orientation or heating and cooling or something else entirely. And better than that - there would be an economic incentive to stop buying electricity from the gas plant.
I don’t think that is that enourmous. It’s more splitting hairs. For example, we can ballpark keeping a home 1°C warmer or cooler year round to be about 500kWh per year, conservatively. That is 5x as much carbon saved at the cost of a difference in comfort that most people wouldn’t notice at all.
Should people care about these savings versus the convenience of freezer position? Sure. But we can’t count on individuals to really consistently give any shits about the climate. And banning freezer-on-the-bottom fridges would be… a touch politically unpopular.
A far better solution than criticizing people’s fridge layout choices is just levying a carbon tax, since then any given person can decide if they want their carbon budget to go towards fridge orientation or heating and cooling or something else entirely. And better than that - there would be an economic incentive to stop buying electricity from the gas plant.