I want to make Linux my main OS. I’ve used Windows for decades. Since Vista or 7, the Windows security model is this, from what I understand:
- unprivileged programs have limited/no ability to do scary things to your computer. they might be able to read some data, but it’s not going to implant malware in the boot sequence for Windows.
- if a program wants escalation, it triggers a UAC popup and the user has to accept it. Remote programs cannot accept UAC on a physical person’s behalf. Escalated programs have admin level control and can do the scary things.
- As with any OS, there may be privilege escalation vulnerabilities that escalate (1) into (2).
I’ve only had Windows malware a few times since Win7, and the entry point was fairly avoidable. (Running a sketchy EXE, and a possible drive-by malware install via an advertisement. I could never prove the latter.)
I have never run a password on my Windows machines.
On any system, physical access is game over.
On Linux, the password is paramount. I’ve tried to understand the security model and I keep failing. Synthesizing from arch wiki
SSH
Equivalent to local physical access as the user. If it’s a sudoers or root account, it can do scary things. Not a threat if ssh is disabled or well secured (password or key pairs).
If a network has a well configured firewall (on the router), it should block ssh requests from outside the network unless the admin specifically wants SSH outside the network.
As with any OS, there may be bugs that allow remote access outside of SSH.
Local login / password prompts to physical users
Without a password, you can’t escalate to root and install new software. Some software, often dealing with hardware (smartctl) requires sudo/root to run.
Encrypted drives
Passwords can decrypt drives if they are encrypted.
Keyrings
Some DEs (KDE) offer a ‘keyring’ that stores passwords. It’s locked/encrypted with a password, usually the same as the login password.
So what am I missing? Is Windows + UAC + no password secure? What is Linux protecting us from by using passwords?
Physical access isn’t game over, it’s only game over to a determined hacker. The vast majority of people aren’t competent enough for it to be an issue. It’s just like how a determined thief can get through almost any lock or door, but it takes effort and time, and skill which many casuals just won’t have.
Full-disk encryption passwords are the most important password, they can prevent physical access from being game-over.
Unix was originally designed to be multi-user, so different passwords protect different users from each other.
Linux doesn’t have a UAC-without-passwords equivalent really, programs can interact with the Linux UAC equivalents just as much as you can, so the password makes sure it’s really you, and not a malicious program or person. UAC on Linux would require an almost fundamental architecture change, in a way contrary to most of how Linux is used now.
Did you really never use a password with Windows? That seems wild to me.
The idea of not having a password at all is just so foreign to me, did you at least use biometrics or something?
It seems like not having a password would make some UAC bypasses easier, too.