𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agoI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.comimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1351arrow-down16
arrow-up1345arrow-down1imageI'd pay good money to see this parodyi.pinimg.com𝔗𝚎𝚑 𝔅𝚊𝚖𝚜𝚔𝚒@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squaregjoel@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up39·1 day agoShould have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
minus-squareSomeonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoI’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·1 day agoThere’s no boromir in the image
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoIt’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe. This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.
Should have kept a Sean bean in there unchanged.
I’d much prefer to see Bean Bean instead.
There’s no boromir in the image
That’s the problem.
It’s Schrödinger’s Bean. We won’t know who is playing Boromir until we observe.
This way it can be funny both ways at the same time.