• cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 minutes ago

    They did. Here’s the interior of the Pantheon, rocking since the 2nd century AD.

    Interior of the pantheon

    • catwoman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      9 hours ago

      As far as I’m concerned the French and Italians are Roman. Rome ruled over all of them and all these so call different types of architecture they have are just Roman influence with a spin

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        31 minutes ago

        Medieval to early modern Europe

        Romanesque: An early medieval style that developed from Roman architecture, featuring round arches, thick walls, and often large, sturdy structures.

        Gothic: Known for pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and flying buttresses, which allowed for taller buildings with large stained-glass windows, creating a sense of soaring height and light.

        Renaissance: A revival of classical forms and principles, emphasizing symmetry, proportion, and harmony, with a renewed interest in Roman architecture.

        Baroque: A dramatic and opulent style characterized by grandeur, movement, and rich ornamentation, with elaborate and sometimes theatrical designs.

        Rococo: A lighter, more decorative and asymmetrical style that developed from the Baroque, using pastel colors, elaborate curves, and floral motifs.

        Neoclassicism: A 18th and 19th-century revival of classical styles, reacting against the opulence of Baroque and Rococo with a return to symmetry and the grandeur of ancient Greece and Rome.

        image shows the grand staircase of the Royal Palace of Turin (Palazzo Reale) in Italy.

        So, Roman

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Turin’s royal palace is from the 17th century. The western Roman empire had collapsed more than a millenium prior to this. Do you consider the Eiffel Tower a Roman monument too? or maybe a Parisii Gaul one?

        You can obviously say that the Roman empire is one influence over western European architecture. But “Roman architecture” is going to imply the style and techniques used by the ancient Romans, and this palace was not built with those.

      • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The term would be Latin then.

        Roman is specific to the city/kingdom/Republic/empires. Latin is the tern for the culture they had/left behind.

        Edit: usually

        • catwoman@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Latin is the language. Always will be and no one speaks it like that. It was a ugly language

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is 17th century. Lots of actual Roman empire buildings were impressively sturdy and at least partially subsist, but this is nowhere near as old.

      Not sure where OP is from, it might seem ancient if you’re from the US, but “twice as old as the White House” is not really that old in Europe.

        • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          And they’re all nearly identical. About 3 sound like something a person could feasibly say. Pretty terrible bot, if I do say so myself.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Just scanned a few dozen. How are they nearly identical? Not seeing any agenda or shoe-horned replies that aren’t relevant. If it’s a bot, it’s damned good.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I’m seeing a new person who’s literate and obsessive. I hammer out quite a bit in a short time and I’m not too bright.

          Scanning those comments, I don’t see any nefarious agenda. They’re mostly in the lemmy vibe. Some are a bit counter, but I would expect that from a thinking human.

          EDIT: I should note, I’m showing 2 hour old account ATM. How did you get a comment count? Manually?

          • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I’m seeing a new person who’s literate and obsessive. I hammer out quite a bit in a short time and I’m not too bright

            Now 3h, and 4½ pages of mostly mid-length comments (I’m not sure how the web ui paginates and I didn’t count). No real person can write original thought in that amount in that short time. If this is not AI generated it’s massively copy-pasted from elsewhere.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Interesting! Still, the comments seem on point to the OP. Maybe LLMs are more convincing than I understand.

              What’s the agenda here? That’s what puzzles me.

              • stoy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 hours ago

                At first, try to establish trust that they are human, then when they are accepted, learn from that an implement in new bots.

                Once you have a few bots with a decent reputation, you can change it’s instructions to start pushing your agenda.

    • Taco2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not sure where this picture was taken, but if it’s in Rome, then this still probably built by Romans. Just not the ancient ones.