• Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 小时前

    I think it was only like 6 billion, right?

    A huge number on its own, but in this context it’s nothing.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 小时前

      He paid 44 billion for Twitter and it took him a few days to raise that much money. He could have been the man to write the cheque to end world hunger and be honored by millions for generations to come (despite all his other bullshit), but he chose not to.

      The world starves not because we cannot feed the hungry, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 小时前

      Yup. The actual sources of world hunger aren’t material but systemic. So it’s not as easy as just “giving everyone food”, but the more complicated “give everyone access to a robust agriculture supply chain”.
      Fortunately, giving 1-2% of people fertilizer and some work animals might be a bit more complicated, it’s significantly cheaper.