• INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    It pains me to give trump the benifit of doubt greatly but I’d love to see some solid evidence of it not being drug smugglers so we can nail him the fuck down for it in the future.

    • entwine@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Everyone already explained why your view on this issue is misguided, so I’ll just add one thing: even if these people are guilty of drug smuggling, that is not a crime that’s punishable by death in the United States.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Besides the fact that evidence doesn’t work that way, the Administration has options here if they actually believed those were drug boats. The 50BMG rifle exists to put a big hole in an engine block. There are snipers good enough to make that shot at a few hundred yards in a helicopter.

      They choose to use a much more expensive missile that just so happens to obliterate any evidence.

      They’re just killing random fishers.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      A lack of evidence of innocence isn’t the same thing as evidence of guilt.

      Even if they were guilty of smuggling drugs, using missiles to murder them is excessive force.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      It pains me to give trump the benifit of doubt greatly

      then don’t?

      but I’d love to see some solid evidence of it not being drug smugglers

      it’s pretty hard to get evidence from an exploded small boat, sunk in the ocean… not counting that proving negatives is fairly hard (which is why that’s not how evidence works)… how do you “prove” to me you are not a drug smuggler?

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          ok so I send my military to kill you and now it’s up to whomever to prove I did wrong… great deal for me

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              51 minutes ago

              wow you really don’t know? SCOTUS already ruled your president is king, they literally said it was ok for POTUS to kill political enemies without any due process (that was an example presented)

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah that’s not how evidence works. The onus is on him to provide evidence that they are drug boats, which should be trivial for the largest military in the world.

      Why would you ever give him the benefit of the doubt here?

      • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Would you trust any evidence coming from him?

        I said I don’t want to give him the benifit of doubt.

        But those courts might and it would just be more difficult to lock him up without evidence, but fuck me I guess lol.

    • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Completely agree. I think that they’d be waving it about if they did.