LEGO is being greedy by charging more money than their product is worth. I’m not sure what you don’t seem to understand. LEGO wants you to pay 400 dollars for a set that has a value of 200 tops and the actual value likely much less than that.
I don’t understand why you’d say I would mistake greed for value when all I do is agree with you on Lego overpricing their products and saying that this is neither new nor exclusive to this set.
You seem to have mistaken greed for value.
No, I don’t think so. Compared to other companies, Lego is massively overpriced and has been for years (and no, Lego does not offer better quality).
Yeah, thats my point.
But then I don’t get your comment, at least not your second one.
First, you criticise Lego’s pricing, which I extend (“has been for a long time”) but then you say I mistake greed for value? I don’t get it.
LEGO is being greedy by charging more money than their product is worth. I’m not sure what you don’t seem to understand. LEGO wants you to pay 400 dollars for a set that has a value of 200 tops and the actual value likely much less than that.
I don’t understand why you’d say I would mistake greed for value when all I do is agree with you on Lego overpricing their products and saying that this is neither new nor exclusive to this set.