Both Anthropic and OpenAI have been accused of training their AI models on copyrighted materials uploaded to a piracy website called LibGen.
Communications show that OpenAI deleted the dataset, a move that plaintiffs argue could be construed as intentional destruction of evidence. Judge Ona Wang has already found that OpenAI improperly withheld materials, per Bloomberg.
thinking about that interview where Sam Altman was super sketchy when asked about that whistleblower who was found dead
My “don’t ask me about dead whistleblowers” shirt is causing many questions already answered by the shirt.
Can’t believe openai is making me side with the part suing pirates.
This is one of those court cases where the best you can hope for is that someone ignites a leaky gas line under the courthouse
If anything I hope openAI loses only so that techbros think twice about monetizing other people’s creative works.
That’s right – because no (or very few) actual “authors” will get any money from settlements or damage awards, only the publishers who own the copyrights.
deleted by creator
Wish there was a way to stop them (AI companies) from using pirated sources but that can’t happen without significant DRM either… and like, they’ll just find a way anyway.
Personally I think the big push to put AI products inside of everything is just to establish a channel to harvest user data from every facet rather than provide any stated functions to the user. The artwork theft feels like just the very tip of the abusive iceberg as it were
deleted by creator
