The brazen daytime heist at the Louvre was carried out by petty criminals rather than professionals from the world of organised crime, the Paris prosecutor has said, describing two of the suspects as a couple with children.

The assertion comes two weeks after thieves parked a stolen truck outside the world’s most-visited museum, used a furniture lift to reach the first floor, then smashed their way into one of the museum’s most ornate rooms. Less than seven minutes later, they escaped on scooters with crown jewels worth an estimated €88m (£76m).

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is pretty much always the case with high profile heists like this. Organized criminals are usually smart enough to realize that selling incredibly famous stolen objects is basically impossible, and the people who steal them are too stupid to realize that.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So if this wasn’t organized crime, how they hell did they think they would fence priceless treasures?! Maybe they were cold-blooded enough to chop it all up into bits, get what they could, but FFS, no fence would touch that shit for years, if not a decade+.

    You would have to have billionaire buyers lined up, kinda people who have the money to stash such goods in a private collection, and I doubt even the wealthiest would risk it. Who could they show it to?! I wouldn’t let my own wife know I had such a thing under our roof.

    To paraphrase: If you’re going to steal the king’s shit, you better not fail selling it.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Who could they show it to?!

      Their rich amoral friends on their private islands that don’t have law enforcement. But how random poor’s would ever get in touch with a billionaire to sell the jewels I don’t know.

        • poopkins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          A jeweler who won’t ask questions will cut them into smaller stones. Nobody’s checking their origins.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Yeah but it’s devastating to resale value. A gem twice the size can be worth orders of magnitude more than the other. Talking about reducing something worth probably a third or half billion dollars to maybe a few million in scrap value.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they’re petty criminals, what does that say about Louvre security?

    • blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, exactly. This article seems to be trying to insult the criminals, but it just makes the Louvre look even worse.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s what I thought at first but the headline leaves out “from the world of organized crime.”

        It sounds like they are making the distinction between organized crime and thieves operating on their own aka “petty criminals.” The word “petty” has many pejorative connotations but it can also just mean small in scale or scope, and that appears to be the meaning here.

        • blave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You’re over analyzing this. They’re very likely was a “original headline“ written by the author of the article, then some copywriter or copy editor gotten involved, whose job is to increase clicks and engagement, and so the headline got walked into something more salacious.

          • scarabic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You just added more analysis :D

            I’m just pointing out the words actually used in the article and what they mean. I’m sure you’re right about how it got this way.

  • tomiant@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    I think it’s petty to call them petty criminals when they stole from the Louvre! No honor among journalists. At the bare minimum, you gotta give them cred for showing initiative and go outside their comfort zone. In any workplace these guys would be promotion material. They’re branching out, aiming higher.

    Respect the ambition.

    edit: would love to sit in on their meetings

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    if this was their first job, then boy I can’t wait to see where their new art thief careers take them

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    What’s really odd is that France already pays Gendarmerie to stand around in public places, protect cultural assets etc.

    If even one dude was standing in the corner of the gallery with a rifle slung up that day, that would likely have deterred the entire theft.