• NotSteve_@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m not really sure how this would work (ignoring that Trump would never let it happen). Do all the people living there get citizenship? I’d imagine a flood of people trying to move there just to win Canadian citizenship if it was announced ahead of time, so the only thing I can think is that it’d be anyone who’s lived there for a certain length of time or up until the announcement date. But then, do family members get citizenship as well? Like what if the child of a family there is off at college when it goes through. It’d be unfair to split up the family so the children would need citizenship as well.

    Maybe I’m overthinking it though considering its such a tiny underpopulated area

    • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Why would you give them citizenship at all? They would be given PR status and we would probably offer to buy out anyone who didn’t wish to become a Canadian PR.

      Pretty easy, if they want citizenship they can do what every other American has to do.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      You could make it so that anyone who was born in or had an address in Point Roberts for at least a year from the date the peninsula is absorbed into Canada is automatically considered a Canadian citizen.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Maybe I’m overthinking it though considering its such a tiny underpopulated area

      ^

      Once they get their citizenship there’d be no particular reason not to use the normal rules around things like family. And according to the article half are dual citizens anyway.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      IF it could happen, and became part of Canada, I assume the American citizens living there would gain Permanent Residence status. Then would need to apply for Canadian Citizenship

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Do they retain American citizenship, then? Not making people stateless is a pretty big thing in international law.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Do they retain American citizenship, then?

          There’s an entire Internet full of facts you can look up. This fact is one of them.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            How do you look up something from a made-up hypothetical?

            There isn’t even modern precedent for ceding territory from the US to Canada, and pre-1900 all kinds of things were different, including borders all being open.

            • k0e3@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’m guessing they’re talking about looking up rules regarding permanent residency. Or maybe dual-citizenship in Canada.

              As a PR of Canada, I can confirm you can have your original citizenship and PR. Even when I become a Canadian citizen eventually, I don’t have to give up my original one since Canada is ok with dual-citizenship.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Because they’re from a place that’s (now) Canada, not the US. I mean, you could look at it either way.

            You’d have to include provisions to stop them from being deported the same way other permanent residents can, but it could be done.

            • Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Im confused why they would ever be stateless, Its not like they would lose their US citizenship, so they still wouldnt be stateless.

              Yeah there are multiple ways to do this i dont even understand how it was a question. Transfer of the territory and giving residency/citizenship to the people on it would have to happen simultaniously. Its not like they would do one, drag their heels on it for 30 years and then the other.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I was kind of thinking it would be a swap situation. Like, if they’re just a US citizen they’d be just a Canadian citizen afterwards.

                The more I think about it the more unlikely that seems, though.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Calder points to the United States’ transfer of the town of Rio Rico from Texas to Mexico in the 1970s as a precedent that could be followed.

    TIL.

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump is more likely to annex Vancouver than he is to give up any US territory.