#1. Why a wikipedia conference? I’ve never seen any notable paedophile drama from them
#2. How fucking embarrassing would it be to be beaten up by people who edit an encyclopaedia for fun? They’d be listing the body parts they kick in Latin and correcting each other on the pronunciation.
edit: With citations. They would cite formal literature about the bone they break to prove they’re breaking it.
Why a wikipedia conference? I’ve never seen any notable paedophile drama from them
I doubt this is related at all, but I have heard there was a bit of a admin civil war on wikipedia over the “Age of Consent” page, but surprisingly it wasn’t AnCaps arguing the page should contain arguments for it’s lowers, but because of a very vocal group who thinks the AOC should be raised to 25 constantly trying to edit the page to say it should be 25.
Why a wikipedia conference? I’ve never seen any notable paedophile drama from them
Assuming his goal was to draw attention to his ‘cause’, then maybe he’s thinking better chance of the incident getting a wiki page and thus more attention if he did it there, than maybe just a local news article not many would read if it was elsewhere
#1. Why a wikipedia conference? I’ve never seen any notable paedophile drama from them
#2. How fucking embarrassing would it be to be beaten up by people who edit an encyclopaedia for fun? They’d be listing the body parts they kick in Latin and correcting each other on the pronunciation.
edit: With citations. They would cite formal literature about the bone they break to prove they’re breaking it.
I doubt this is related at all, but I have heard there was a bit of a admin civil war on wikipedia over the “Age of Consent” page, but surprisingly it wasn’t AnCaps arguing the page should contain arguments for it’s lowers, but because of a very vocal group who thinks the AOC should be raised to 25 constantly trying to edit the page to say it should be 25.
Hexbear users are wiki admins??
The internet really is a magical place
what too many pop science “factoids” do to a mf
The editor in question:
I can attest to this. He’s done a great job in the NYC wiki scene
Being a pedo is a bannable offense on Wikipedia
Even if you’re wearing a sign that clearly says you’re a non-offending paedophile? Can’t they read the sign?
Their “I’m a non-offending pedophile” shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by their shirt
Assuming his goal was to draw attention to his ‘cause’, then maybe he’s thinking better chance of the incident getting a wiki page and thus more attention if he did it there, than maybe just a local news article not many would read if it was elsewhere
I mean I get that. I wish my dog’s little country had a wikipedia page too but I don’t want to edit it myself. Too much syntax stuff to learn.