• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have a security concern with Chinese EVs.

    They’re far too computerized, and connected, at this point.

    The last thing I want is the ability for the Chinese government to disable a quarter of the Canadian vehicle fleet if they decided they wanted to. Or potentially even worse than disabling them in some cases.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is possible with most modern vehicles today. They nearly all have cellular modems built in and very few have the driving related systems separated from the ‘infotainment’ crapware. 2014ish jeeps could be bricked by OTA updates to the fucking radio, there’s a good Defcon talk about it

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, but I’d much rather have the company controlling the official switch not be directly under the control of China.

        The US is only marginally better right now, but they have less incentive to do it and less control of their car companies.

        • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          A vulnerability was found this year in an undisclosed major car manufacture in the USA that gave total control to an attacker over all vehicles sold by that manufacture’s dealerships. Remote start/shutoff, unlock doors, GPS tracking, even transferring the ownership to another person. All modern vehicles are a security nightmare, the chinese are no better, no worse. https://eaton-works.com/2025/10/13/def-con-33/

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            They are worse, because the Chinese government has direct access to an official kill switch if they want it.

            Just because there can be other problems doesn’t make that any less of a problem

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      American cars are the same, and China hasn’t joked about making us their 24th province.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m far less concerned about the American government disabling vehicles in Canada. If America wanted to take us over we couldn’t even dream of stopping them.

        China could benefit from causing problems though.

        • acargitz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          At this point it’s not even inconceivable for Americans to do something as retaliation for, say, Dougie Ford shutting down electricity. Or use it as a bargain chip as part of playing it tough in a negotiation.

          Or forget the taking us over bit. It’s not the taking over that is hard for them, it’s keeping control. We can very effectively resist and make the occupation extremely costly for them. Every bit of leverage they have makes this harder.

          Fuck, is it that inconceivable that if they go full Gilead they wouldn’t start shit like controlling whether you can drive your car to an abortion clinic?