Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel like the title doesn’t match the content.

    The video gives an elaborate description on their evaluation of “AI” and it’s influence on the Internet at large. And then they conclude with “we’ll continue like before” directly contradicting the title.

    Feels disingenuous. And ironic after they talked about their extensive investments into fact checking.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Do you think if we pool every AI in the world it will be able to figure out the difference between its and it’s? Seems unlikely.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The channel hat always been disingenuous. It’s not the first video they have where they develop a well written essay that has conclusions that make no sense with the information presented. It’s the theater of research without any of the substance. The editors just do whatever they want, under the expectations that the writing team will support their preconceived notion.

      They’re an entertainment channel, not a science communication channel. They have said some awful, totally not fact supported stuff in the past.