• rozodru@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      after the 3rd of 4th time of having to reinstall Win11 because the ONLY solution to fixing the wifi adapter that Windows always insisted on deleting was to reinstall the OS I switched to linux. I’ll never go back.

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I mean, I think that they had some real data privacy issues with the “screenshot everything by default” stuff.

      However, my bet is that at some point in time, it will be the case that we do wind up in a situation where you do have some kind of system that is processing your data and doing some kind of analysis so that you can make use of it. It may not leave your system (though OS vendors providing storage and “cloud backup” services are a thing with Apple and Google and Microsoft today). But think of, for example, search. On most systems today, there is something that is trawling through your data, building an index, processing it, and putting it in some form via which you can access it. On mine, I don’t run a full-text indexing thing, but those certainly do exist.

      That doesn’t mean that these particular laptops will be what does it, or that MIcrosoft’s CoPilot software — in its present form, at any rate, though if they use it as their “brand” for all their machine learning stuff, it could do all sorts of stuff — will be what uses it, or even that laptops will start doing a lot more local processing in general. But I think that the basic thing that they are shooting for, which is in some way, the PC extracting information from your data and then using it in some way to provide more-useful behavior, probably will be a thing.

      On emacs, by default, M-/ runs dabbrev-expand. That looks through all buffers and, depending upon how you have things set up, possibly some other data sources, and using that as a set of potential completions, tries to complete whatever word is at point in the current buffer. Think of it as sort of a “global tab complete”. That’s a useful feature to have, and it’s a — much simpler — example of something where the system can look at your data and generate something something useful from it via doing some processing. That’s been around for a long time.

      A number of systems will look at one’s contacts list to provide completions or suggestions.

      It’s pretty much the norm — though I presently have it off on my Android phone, because the soft keyboard I use, Anysoft, presently has some bug that causes it to insert bogus text in some applications — on mobile systems to have some kind of autocorrection for text input, and that usually has some kind of “user dictionary”, and at least on some soft keyboards I’ve seen, automatic learning to generate entries for that “user dictionary” based on past text that you’ve entered is a thing.

      Speech recognition hasn’t quite become the norm for interfacing with a computer the way a lot of sci-fi in the past portrayed it (though there are some real hands-free applications for driving), but on systems that do use it, it’s pretty much the norm to learn from past speech and use it to improve current recognition.

      Those are all examples of the system shuffling through your data and using it to improve perfomance elsewhere. They certainly can have data privacy issues, like malicious soft keyboards on mobile OSes having access to everything one types. But they have established themselves. So I kind of suspect that Microsoft’s basic idea of ramming a lot of your data — maybe not everything you see on the screen — into a machine learning system and then using that training to do something useful for you is going to probably be a thing at some point in the future.

      EDIT: There have been situations in the past where a new technology came out and companies tried really hard to find a business application for it, and it never really went anywhere. One example of that is 3D hardware rendering. When 3D hardware came out, outside of CAD and architecture, it was mostly used for video games. There were a some companies who tried figuring out ways to get companies to spend on it because they could do something useful for them. I remember Intel showing rotating 3D charts and stuff. Today, we still mostly use 3D hardware rendering for playing video games, and there isn’t much of a business case for it.

      My guess is that that probably won’t be the fate of with general machine learning running on our data. That is, there may be more data privacy safeguards put into place, or data might not leave our systems, or learning might happen at a different places than based on screenshots, or might not actually run on a laptop, or any number of things. But I suspect that someone is going to manage to produce some kind of system that leverages parallel processing to run a machine learning system that is going to perform tasks that businesses find valuable enough to spend on it.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Install portmaster on your windows computer and monitor it for a day.

    Come back for advice on your next Linux distribution.

    Only people who will be using windows at home are people who don’t respect themselves.

  • AlterEgoTest@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Copilot is by far the worst llm type software i have ever used.

    Even there big selling feature of being integrated into office apps is a joke.

    Claude code does a vastly better job at knowing what a .txt file is, can generate and editing office files from the commandline. Claude put zero effort into making Microsoft software compatible, it just is as a natural consequence of being less incompetent.

    • bizarroland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      One of my co-workers is pro co-pilot for some fucking reason. He actually paid for his own subscription to use on his work machine. 'Cause he’s… I don’t know. He’s not an idiot, but he does idiotic things.

      That aside, he used the co-pilot app in Outlook to search for an email, and co-pilot in Outlook tells him it cannot search inside of fucking Outlook for your emails.

      He looked at me, and he asked me, “What am I supposed to do with this?”

      My response was, “the only reason it’s there is for you to tell it to draft you an email that someone else will then receive, and put into co-pilot to then re-condense back into the original one sentence blurb that you crafted the email with.”

      He’s paying $20 a month out of his own pocket that he’s at work working for in order to have software shoved into his software that does not do what you need it to do and cannot do what you need it to do.

      I think the computing space would be a better place if every person that worked with Microsoft either quit or, like, I don’t know, volunteered for lobotomy.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I got a new job and they gave me an outlook account. I asked copilot to look at an email and add the event details to my calendar. It couldn’t do it. 5 or 6 times I asked and it was unable. It wanted to create an ICS for me to download and import. Fuckin useless. Turned it off.

      • ShieldsUp@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I turned off copilot in the outlook settings and the UI refuses to remove the icon. The icon flashes in full color, next to other things I use, before then going grey/disabled, but its impossible to remove it. So it shoves it in your face every day even after you already learned how much it sucks. Fucking worthless software and UI design going on at Microsoft.

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not incompetence, they’d wish it was. It’s actually offering something like 30 different subscription plans, each offering a different slice of the possibilities. You’d actually have to pay a small fortune each month to have access to the full copilot stuff.

      Source: was involved in a pilot project for work to test the use cases last year.

  • undu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be exact, they are empowering Microsoft future. This is because of the absolute insane amount of money they are pumping into LLMs while still not finding a business case for them.