Is it clear?

    • mika_mika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hey I’m a woman, why do you feel the need to say trans inclusive, and not just “women only” this is my first time discovering this instance. And it comes off as performative although I see you’re drawing a line in the sand between you and the terfs-- but imo you’re just acknowledging the existence of terfs more than validating trans women.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t think it’s a useful strategy to not acknowledge the existence of terfs or trans people. In a lot of similar communities there is always the question of whether trans people are actually included or not, and even if so, who under the trans spectrum, which always makes me uncertain about my place.

        And also, just ignoring problems such as terfs is not a solution. They exist whether their existence is acknowledged or not, sweeping things under the rug isn’t helpful

        Though, yeah, it is made clear in the rules, which I appreciate