• TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a pretty decent shot for your average joe, but by no means something that requires a “professional”. Anyone with a little experience with rifle hunting usually has a grouping of 3-4 inches or better at 200 yards. Assuming they were aiming center mass, they were ranged high by about 4-5" high, but dead center for windage.

      So imo a good shot considering the nerves that come with the situation, but a bit sloppy if we were talking about target shooting at the range.

      • SickSemper [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        2 days ago

        People treating a 200 m shot like it’s a Hitman style assassination is blowing my mind, yes it was a precise single shot, but immediately going “specops marksman inside job” for that distance is wild

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not anything to sneeze at considering the circumstances, I’ve whiffed worse at 200 yards on a deer. However, it’s not exactly going to require Jason borne or anything.

        • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          2 days ago

          a little rough with irons from the shoulder, pretty easy with a scope and anything to set the gun on. main issues are going to be wind and not zeroing the scope with the ammo you’re using on the big day.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’d say it would be an excellent shot with irons from the shoulder, but my eyes aren’t what they used to be. Windage and zeroing aren’t really a factor at 200 yards unless the wind is extreme. Even with bad wind at 200 yards most of your hunting caliber rounds will only drift 2-3 inches at most. Most long range rifles are zeroed at 200-300 yards.

            He was dead center for windage, just a bit high for range. The main issue is this scenario is mainly nerves, which is prob why his range was 4-5 inches high, prob jerked on the trigger a little or his rifle was ranged for 300-400 yards. Can’t say I haven’t whiffed it worse while hunting at that distance, and I wasn’t in immediate danger of being arrested or killed by a game warden or anything.

            Imo a real decent shot for most shooters with a bit of experience when considering the circumstances. Adrenaline is a real big factor when it comes to accuracy, really fucks with your fine motor skills.

        • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s me. I’m the problem. It’s me. It seems like an incredible shot. 2.5x the distance of Lee Harvy Oswald who took multiple shots. I know nothing about guns. It would seem to me like it required foresight and planning, especially if you have a getaway plan. Then you have to keep yourself steady when it’s showtime as well indicated experience to me.

          Is that something an amateur marksman can do? It seems really well executed.

            • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              I ran away with the idea that it would take a soldier to get that kind of experience. Mossad seems a little dubious because they’re on the same side. Seems like Mamdani or Hasan would get their ire first. So I guess my line of thinking runs dry if I try to ascribe an active soldier carrying out an entity’s will

                • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Like honestly I think reinforcing the “this was a pro” “this was Israel/Ukraine” conspiracy theories is the best way to spare the left a bit of extra pressure. The right wing conspiracy folks are fighting over who did it right now.

                  • SickSemper [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I misread it as “lose a Big Head mouth piece”

                    Martyrdom goes both ways maybe? Killing Hasan could galvanize more people into radial politics just like killing Kirk could inspire conservatives targeting liberals? To be clear I don’t personally believe this was an op (yet)

          • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Is that something an amateur marksman can do?

            Oh, definitely. Guns are easier to shoot than you think. Put in a few hours of practice and you hit this shot any day.

        • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          its literally a professional hit wym lol, the shooter being a pro or not doesn’t really matter, the hit was a pro hit.

        • Lenins_Sabocat@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure, but there’s also the planning, the escape route, the not getting spotted/identified, the stress. There’s a lot pointing at someone with more than just casual experience.