• LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    This is not about social media bans, it’s against the corrupt government. It’s being reframed. If you think about it, if the only problem was social media ban, they’d just all get vpns. They’re not stupid. They’re trying to frame it as silly kids, (because they’re all gen z and Gen alpha, in their school uniforms, so as to be less likely to be shot) who can’t live without social media. But it’s not, it’s protesting deep government corruption. If word gets out that it’s a protest against government corruption, other people facing similar oppression, may become emboldened, so it’s being buried.

    • ssladam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yep. Running the standard playbook. They wouldn’t do it, if it wasn’t so effective. Today they’d be calling the Boston Tea Party a bunch of anti-caffeine health nuts.

      • zrst@lemmy.cif.su
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The American Revolution happened because colonizers didn’t want to help repay Britain for its help in the French Indian War.

    • zrst@lemmy.cif.su
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      if the only problem was social media ban, they’d just all get vpns. They’re not stupid.

      This is a major leap in logic. I’m not saying your point is wrong, but plenty of people won’t get VPNs because they are too ignorant to see the value in them.