• ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Never in my life did I ever expect to be seeing this much soviet propoganda.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    And that was after being completely devastated during the war, and rebuilding to challenge the US who sat the war out and built out their industries while the rest of the world burned.

  • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Both can be true. Over time the Soviet Union economy got worse because there was no corrective mechanism. A lot of the leadership (especially Stalin) was more interested in maintaining their own power than governing effectively. The Soviet Union being subject to US interference couldn’t be a democracy, but it’s difficult to correct errors in the economy without democracy.

    China has managed to overcome the issue of dictatorships, and it’ll be interesting to see what’ll happen as America shoots itself in the foot.

      • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I meant dictatorship, I have fixed it. Generally dictatorships can’t really correct course when they’re making errors, in terms of the institutions they’ve built they’re failing to do that but in terms of policy they are generally correcting the mistakes they make (albeit slowly).

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Then, among other things, 46 years of “first world” imperialist pressures took its toll. And then those same imperialist states introduced neocolonial shock therapy and plundered the socialist commons.

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean I’d say off the bat there’s so much more complicated than “it succeeded” or “it failed”.

      Every system ever made can fail, with issues completely unrelated to the system.

      Ignoring the government, would we call a developing nation implimenting a new system, before getting attacked by a massively stronger country with a different (or even the same system), a failure of the system.

      Or getting destroyed by a natural disaster… or millions of other factors.

      Secondly, just fucking horrible ideas within them. I have to give Lycenko huge parts of the economic woe’s of the soviet union. Likewise right now in capitalist America we can see RFK Jr’s health system and Trumps tarriff system as likely to wreck the shit of the USA.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Communism is not about an economy, but about freedom of science, education, and general peoples wellbeing

    So stop fucking measuring it by Capitalist standards

    Its like calling a Banana a lesser fruit because it has less seeds in it than a cocoa fruit.

    • m532@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But that’s the cool thing about communism: doesn’t matter how you measure it, it’s always better.

    • techpeakedin1991@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Improving people’s well-being? So, like making sure they have good food and a place to live and medicine and clothes and transport and some entertainment and stuff? So, having a good economy?