No. They want the young children to be easier to sexually abuse. They are trying to ban anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse by teaching them about their bodies, sex, and consent.
I think it is intended to convey that knowledge of these things makes young children harder to sexually abuse. For example, if young boys recognize that guys can have sexual relationships with each other, they’re more inclined to question the motives of an overly nice, male stranger. The awkward phrasing makes me think the commenter just typed a little faster than he was reading and tongue(?)tied themself.
Makes young children easier to sexually abuse* ?
No. They want the young children to be easier to sexually abuse. They are trying to ban anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse by teaching them about their bodies, sex, and consent.
I think it is intended to convey that knowledge of these things makes young children harder to sexually abuse. For example, if young boys recognize that guys can have sexual relationships with each other, they’re more inclined to question the motives of an overly nice, male stranger. The awkward phrasing makes me think the commenter just typed a little faster than he was reading and tongue(?)tied themself.
Does the addition of the word, “that” in front of, “makes young…” make my intention clearer?
They said the bans are trying to erase anything that makes young children harder to sexually abuse.